Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261463AbTIKSsK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:48:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261464AbTIKSsK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:48:10 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust4.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.4]:46482 "EHLO dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261463AbTIKSrf (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:47:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux on Intel Server Board SE7501WV2 From: Alan Cox To: Yaoping Ruan Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1063305980.3605.7.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 (1.4.4-5) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:46:20 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1089 Lines: 23 On Iau, 2003-09-11 at 18:39, Yaoping Ruan wrote: > We plan to install Linux (2.4.21 and later with epoll patch) on an Intel > Server Board SE7501WV2 with 1 XEON 2.4GHz CPU, 4GB PC2100 DDR memory, and > a Seagate 120GB ATA 7200RPM harddisk, and use the server box for high > demand SpecWeb99 tests. Does anyone have any experience on this Server > Board, and see any compatibility problem here? It ought to run Specweb99 nicely if you load a tux enabled kernel and tux enabled web servers on it. The lack of a real disk I/O subsystem may well hurt a lot though > An other question about this box is the two on-board Gigabit Network > Controller. Do they work fine on Linux? I believe so. Make sure the chips on the board support zero copy and also interrupt mitigation, preferably also that NAPI capable drivers are used if you are benching. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/