Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 055/105] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix unlocking requests crossing a chip boudary
Date:   Sun,  1 Jul 2018 18:02:05 +0200
Message-Id: <20180701153153.519042281@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180701153149.382300170@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180701153149.382300170@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>

commit 0cd8116f172eed018907303dbff5c112690eeb91 upstream.

The "sector is in requested range" test used to determine whether
sectors should be re-locked or not is done on a variable that is reset
everytime we cross a chip boundary, which can lead to some blocks being
re-locked while the caller expect them to be unlocked.
Fix the check to make sure this cannot happen.

Fixes: 1648eaaa1575 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Support Persistent Protection Bits (PPB) locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock
 		 * sectors shall be unlocked, so lets keep their locking
 		 * status at "unlocked" (locked=0) for the final re-locking.
 		 */
-		if ((adr < ofs) || (adr >= (ofs + len))) {
+		if ((offset < ofs) || (offset >= (ofs + len))) {
 			sect[sectors].chip = &cfi->chips[chipnum];
 			sect[sectors].adr = adr;
 			sect[sectors].locked = do_ppb_xxlock(