Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp3429937imm; Sun, 1 Jul 2018 21:44:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJUyPG1EvlQCX4jDZGNen4FO+gNVKsFs+zWl2bghkA/733o0ZoBcsfuVE7bdU4PJRNxxrUH X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7446:: with SMTP id e6-v6mr24674507plt.161.1530506678923; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 21:44:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530506678; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IP2IhvPrPX5H5TKhs62ZBr+Oac7EctGLF9LheEIZ8SCKWYNbaOAvo98zPV9BbnMFCA hsL1Ye7g4/LtH1bI+cvwmcm40D8FBkfdRXRtxoNpLvfubg3gZTfnZEsCp9rVp/DHsz1F aqKQp2N3KFGFVVlc+sGW6EA6R4sT8n/h6g8sI4g5VJuRjpZTLgDzaZGyJLXhQzjJ4qXA 3VydxszguvE5BdvSh0pcw8amFgshxuCrlULXvq/DoUxppfoBf3Si1f1wqU0QyGJ3ioTi 8SJS4T+YTN9Cs+jzU7RH54tG3HL8DVAbS2z6beheogVRyBuCWsPzuAIU6na40gWvEtu+ X/Kg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=Z1g+yWDJD074xX15TkM3cL3rBgR4exRPRujrejSismA=; b=C7+fpgBxh2CzLfA1zQMqz630gHIkPWmm4TztXpBpNFC4Ogotod1iNYpXKrmBX6gyZJ 8Od9GWfO9kKRSKJYKH+nuKRmQr8pLruE9kvTYY+10zWW3y6cQZ9jfaAxaqfDxm9c/nge T1SO5Zi1leW+V+jGrtHqgOgvT7gHMJqTMMdEA11Yoy5GnEyHFMrzGtkYQRHbduivZC4a MXqwlG9UySHQ2kp8c7hexwY8uyFnJdvh0tomfjQ8scTQEgT4bPeqvyGeLBjjDIKXY7X9 dX4zB90Z/s11BQUjW2rSnbiecR/dceh//k9apeIIx7V0jffELhfObviEa2vRHv78nzWv n/KA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3-v6si12936430pgq.387.2018.07.01.21.44.24; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 21:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933482AbeGBDuG (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 1 Jul 2018 23:50:06 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:52735 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932819AbeGBDt4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2018 23:49:56 -0400 X-UUID: d1f87d98044e4d6ba01b07a532f75891-20180702 Received: from mtkcas09.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.178)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mhqrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1539029916; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:49:53 +0800 Received: from mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.126) by mtkmbs01n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:49:51 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.17.3.153) by mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:49:50 +0800 From: To: , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: mediatek: fixup mtk_pcie_find_port logical Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:49:41 +0800 Message-ID: <1530503384-1218-2-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.4 In-Reply-To: <1530503384-1218-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> References: <1530503384-1218-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Honghui Zhang The Mediatek's host controller has two slots, each with it's own control registers. The host driver need to identify which slot was connected in order to access the device's configuration space. There's problem for current host driver to find out which slot was connected to for a given EP device. Assuming each slot have connect with one EP device as below: host bridge bus 0 --> __________|_______ | | | | slot 0 slot 1 bus 1 -->| bus 2 --> | | | EP 0 EP 1 During PCI enumeration, system software will scan all the PCI device starting from devfn 0. So it will get the proper port for slot0 and slot1 device when using PCI_SLOT(devfn) for match. But it will get the wrong slot for EP1: The devfn will be start from 0 when scanning EP1 behind slot1, it will get port0 since the PCI_SLOT(EP1) is match for port0's slot value. So the host driver should not using EP's devfn but the slot's devfn(the slot which EP was connected to) for match. This patch fix the mtk_pcie_find_port's logical by using the slot's devfn for match. Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang --- drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c index 0baabe3..b43f41d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c @@ -337,11 +337,26 @@ static struct mtk_pcie_port *mtk_pcie_find_port(struct pci_bus *bus, { struct mtk_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata; struct mtk_pcie_port *port; + struct pci_dev *dev; + struct pci_bus *pbus; - list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) - if (port->slot == PCI_SLOT(devfn)) + list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) { + if (!bus->number && port->slot == PCI_SLOT(devfn)) return port; + if (bus->number) { + pbus = bus; + + while (pbus->number) { + dev = pbus->self; + pbus = dev->bus; + } + + if (port->slot == PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn)) + return port; + } + } + return NULL; } -- 2.6.4