Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp3782367imm; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 05:36:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLO7D3Z0I0RR/fX6v5iyRJAgMuLjv8+Um0k21GwSIp4i85Ecn+ygyfOCYYhcfXFKYODl+hr X-Received: by 2002:a63:7f44:: with SMTP id p4-v6mr21736630pgn.416.1530534974977; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 05:36:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530534974; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iMGQLp6G+RauDr3/S3Be4MWA6O5uFenX0OlZB2Zn9sEDUPfLQ22CrBtsBJU6HWGHdN iWhJH61aGlVbWMI/tw2hla1KKvkAVJpDANmVsQHXZScEyCv5J/iAKIeIFZAyziSxkK30 NZKjVzTeLShr1jKMAWYtsek/EXjRrtAQx5+V8C87UQi6pzs1Ke9bl+xDRscgEEHuyYid DHBJgMZ4yzNiJ6ASEjIEW6H0YxAl5yiDR8h51gLwSXd+kWFEGhrybdhiEn4cN+npTwxp TgVUdHiC3JhlGSyZt5vHtbunIfNjToyUjeiDVLnlnXZ/hgkJ58T/pb28oe8rygx3yldK tx8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=svBch639Bn34wGZ4rTl/l7U2HcVm6r7e5RsmSziEVlE=; b=GDxCKcfNfCb2sNuGwiZPNGp9la8heKPudznSfKknsevgAvLwT4hpMwhPIK44oGUsn4 O0evI0nF7te9YCutBBZPh53mkDPQeQjxqb9qVQrSthuAaSlhvZxAIDqxbaAgcdf8tvh3 tkIIVHbc4mSbWX5Y/iFK2nVIlDiyCZCZwzdUJe5MdGhP3DIJFEFsu0gaYiNB+HsL0mR5 VcEDR2ZGEKlyY0J3ukIAlEXKQgt1JP01nzk+Rz4VBhLfj6BzGqo/04JA71GA0LvMWemd W0boKISPAAJX3EydXWXLmDQrU/JjNJP1kFK2MMhVbAUgDofDrydN4m/+0Qwx53GOer8n cxGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11-v6si2868249pfe.102.2018.07.02.05.36.00; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 05:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933632AbeGBIpR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 04:45:17 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57928 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753148AbeGBIpM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 04:45:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w628iIk3119939 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 04:45:12 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jyg8phdut-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 04:45:11 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:45:10 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:45:05 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w628j4bF26804394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 08:45:04 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60474C046; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:44:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A948C4C052; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:44:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.145.48.243] (unknown [9.145.48.243]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:44:46 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [RFC v3 PATCH 5/5] x86: check VM_DEAD flag in page fault To: Yang Shi , mhocko@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1530311985-31251-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <1530311985-31251-6-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> From: Laurent Dufour Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:45:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1530311985-31251-6-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18070208-0016-0000-0000-000001E25E12 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18070208-0017-0000-0000-00003236B401 Message-Id: <84eba553-2e0b-1a90-d543-6b22c1b3c5f8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-02_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807020103 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/06/2018 00:39, Yang Shi wrote: > Check VM_DEAD flag of vma in page fault handler, if it is set, trigger > SIGSEGV. > > Cc: Michal Hocko > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > --- > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > index 9a84a0d..3fd2da5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > @@ -1357,6 +1357,10 @@ static inline bool smap_violation(int error_code, struct pt_regs *regs) > bad_area(regs, error_code, address); > return; > } > + if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_DEAD)) { > + bad_area(regs, error_code, address); > + return; > + } This will have to be done for all the supported architectures, what about doing this check in handle_mm_fault() and return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV ? > if (error_code & X86_PF_USER) { > /* > * Accessing the stack below %sp is always a bug. >