Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:04:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
        rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Message-ID: <4741715.10696.1530547460698.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
In-Reply-To: <1527399163.10673.1530541966296.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
References: <20180628162359.9054-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <CA+55aFw==YnFJn7iGnKMW=RbPT74YHNa0QDF96mEdMPA2oX9SA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+55aFwJWxsE_LL=-8WgB7uH_mYeMSu=boWF4N5KdOW673g4hA@mail.gmail.com> <247789350.9741.1530288432573.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <CA+55aFz8KyVqFsVnp-6g+thz7vmm5nK_FSdRTPSks7gsNVNRdQ@mail.gmail.com> <184287091.10022.1530301738384.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <CALCETrXqjrCoHX1KyL0iKGBaAZSGJb1cVdNN1gNigJ8DW9LF8w@mail.gmail.com> <1527399163.10673.1530541966296.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.18 1/2] rseq: validate rseq_cs fields are <
 TASK_SIZE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Topic: rseq: validate rseq_cs fields are < TASK_SIZE
Thread-Index: EfNoEXYdmNtWTN5CDgNZeik/VS9bfCDUAY2S
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

----- On Jul 2, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
[...]
> 
> But rather than trying to play games with input validation, I would
> favor an approach that would allow rseq to validate all its inputs
> straightforwardly. Introducing user_64bit_mode(struct pt_regs *)
> across all architectures would allow doing just that. rseq signal
> delivery and return to usermode code could then ensure that high bits are
> cleared by 32-bit tasks for all fields and thus provide a consistent
> behavior for 32-bit tasks running on 32-bit and 64-bit kernels.

AFAIU this could be achieved by re-introducing is_compat_task() on x86 as:

#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
static bool is_compat_task(void)
{
        return user_64bit_mode(current_pt_regs()));
}
#else
static bool is_compat_task(void) { return false; };
#endif

Or am I missing something ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com