Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp300254imm; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLvqfwXwbigwJgUSFULKjXTdq3CUFkPUVA2elWsKREe2ISUz8kxp9WmZno9oe6MxIYPY7WQ X-Received: by 2002:a65:5581:: with SMTP id j1-v6mr23431849pgs.203.1530557109661; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530557109; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oZefovrqPGSqzgdfQUy5l2YOD3QkOruRzlE5DRBz8kufy6MB7m/N7YNiLGBasGnTQA w8Ce+BfaHx3WImXBmIqlgisgq8zu7VMC7pCD/B4K8v9l/o31TLqAdTi+pe7cN95YkaOW c8Qze3mcXaCCUcCvmInEvZMEBcvIlrnqd16+YQ0Xud4GTJd9PnX2PW7BCKKD3obnpoVT 9044+gCQ7IYARoeu5yOnR8b0wQr6BPgLAyE+yYOPu/5H7m5HykgT/1V0hVZyPRS1tEpO AoWVeMSHPPCH+Fwlrv1KCgOCc8QIR5AtersvRQXUqAC8bJnW0a6HNoiGkUErVhWP4yLK ztYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=Pieivp9mo6OEr4dXP2ycd0jLkemPNi9+s4uVeRQ/jYA=; b=zrBoFnkXorFw3jKBLR+GS/a41o4nCzXu+F++MHbQ8NQ/YttUu1Y+lvU5n3yMx8QzXH mjVmo49NyOXSL/c/avsKHH4oMzR9wlnE8oYDUrrwoCgwdzsoIv13/MlsUx2MX9oV7AkU NlX6pNrG35EPm7CsMRy9ggrM9ytOa/h2Ne1qDFa0/G2ZfiBU3HWVosQuf6gFPdSU8Y9b SjIkAKvNdoOvxmp6iM5iq1SPRldJpPhxGpYpBF0QDb9C3jmZVqORKy3RfK15sEKrqB/N y0jms8pwMGzRGp9FK4Pm3cfl2tOnsmkLtsAdWaHPmieQzQrcB5vdeSIBwASANUvIEkxy lDog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HpMqNBqN; dkim=fail header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="G/sMzPCP"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j193-v6si14431634pge.689.2018.07.02.11.44.53; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HpMqNBqN; dkim=fail header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="G/sMzPCP"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753224AbeGBSnn (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:43:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-f193.google.com ([209.85.213.193]:41054 "EHLO mail-yb0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752745AbeGBSnm (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:43:42 -0400 Received: by mail-yb0-f193.google.com with SMTP id s8-v6so1851823ybe.8 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Pieivp9mo6OEr4dXP2ycd0jLkemPNi9+s4uVeRQ/jYA=; b=HpMqNBqNYQq/+ZpWfe6f4jQoIIcCUDHONqudIXBGQNwBplHEf5L45LPAXhTSET8dKh DEZy7dbhbQqtEwd/my30fXoC9O4j5HVcXo7hIHH92wZf09ypy7orLii2BIRmum2UFYK5 0NPQBz3Hw6y/mkrP/gyamSTFv1vrbkyAfoBiMvkKTaQQ4dHQXfuVMeDR9pv6lUv5cP8r 8911EqoOBZZxtZDwHoy7YbEowifGqRmV82irp7daf6N9kZTn2JNFnLjwJmMdG6cSmcvm 380rWOeUEL6mUTjnWoMOshG1qW9AEdDl5DogxbtH2/YC9DfeTl4GZWPs47vmCxZT88K9 4pmw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Pieivp9mo6OEr4dXP2ycd0jLkemPNi9+s4uVeRQ/jYA=; b=G/sMzPCP4Pe9pc6I59MrHebEfGsONOsKHqOSdhE4bJhyPqU2wdAsQzWjH+bcyCVev3 /f7A15q/QF5MLQ1nVzJHgkUt7orKp5rGizId6JuCuTkV1B/8D9A9TCZBqAAUu4JfhDw3 7sflIIO4WEwuiuvi5UfVr6fRe5YIEvskVLD+U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Pieivp9mo6OEr4dXP2ycd0jLkemPNi9+s4uVeRQ/jYA=; b=anOf+ebYtg3efO1vAfZo2KVCGrUB2lnMuKPF+QprtmNfHNbiWRDbxZOSDG2nnPjm/6 mGbTQYtv4KilNDSrGZkKr9df91z/hNZRayGwgHPcAHGNlr+ox0XPtk4jXlKnGQs3WldP JG/h9OeSd53NJvVPvLNdBumCgXG/Nw3ahOEqjiqqOX2MTCyqDRam3xaArL/Vc7yLAzSk m/yhlm6AhAufPfk3DtaJhAND6TlKJtA/MW6Mkv9uDW3bd+hdw1ryJwLhcOzbqZ7dE1ur yzITFUDVbsWIV/dG4gH/67X2OHb8VUW6toUC3Uc9T4sQvOJwmT0q1wFsArAMbL5xtXEP en4A== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2H3O81gfcJYmG/UI5EmPjE2Wc/EMZZs1ieIhyHRXJzDEjRy405 nXOItjiOIvR4maZJFmlOPAe34xLMdxCcYB8mg92RtA== X-Received: by 2002:a25:ce8e:: with SMTP id x136-v6mr3162690ybe.118.1530557021572; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:43:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a25:5f51:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5506a72f-99ac-b47c-4ace-86c43b17b5c5@redhat.com> References: <1530101255-13988-1-git-send-email-crecklin@redhat.com> <5506a72f-99ac-b47c-4ace-86c43b17b5c5@redhat.com> From: Kees Cook Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:43:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9qrUUTMD5EXvoHPYH0iwAMb0GnM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] add param that allows bootline control of hardened usercopy To: Chris von Recklinghausen Cc: Laura Abbott , Paolo Abeni , LKML , Linux-MM , Kernel Hardening , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter Zijlstra Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Christoph von Recklinghausen wrote: > The last issue I'm chasing is build failures on ARCH=m68k. The error is > atomic_read and friends needed by the jump label code not being found. > The config has CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y, so the jump label calls I added > will only be made #ifndef CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP. Do you think that's > worth a mention in the blurb that's added to > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt? Uhm, that's weird -- I think the configs on m68k need fixing then? I don't want to have to sprinkle that ifdef in generic code. How are other users of static keys and jump labels dealing with m68k weirdness? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security