Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:21:12 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>
Cc:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
        Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
        Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
        Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Mark Brand <markbrand@google.com>,
        Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] khwasan: kernel hardware assisted address
 sanitizer
Message-Id: <20180702122112.267261b1e1609cf522753cf3@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFKCwrjxGEa6CLJnjmNy+92d2GSUkoymQ6Sm91CDpMZcJCcWCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1530018818.git.andreyknvl@google.com>
        <20180627160800.3dc7f9ee41c0badbf7342520@linux-foundation.org>
        <CAAeHK+xz552VNpZxgWwU-hbTqF5_F6YVDw3fSv=4OT8mNrqPzg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20180628124039.8a42ab5e2994fb2876ff4f75@linux-foundation.org>
        <CAAeHK+xsBOKghUp9XhpfXGqU=gjSYuy3G2GH14zWNEmaLPy8_w@mail.gmail.com>
        <20180629194117.01b2d31e805808eee5c97b4d@linux-foundation.org>
        <CAFKCwrjxGEa6CLJnjmNy+92d2GSUkoymQ6Sm91CDpMZcJCcWCA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:16:42 -0700 Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:45:08 +0200 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >> What kind of memory consumption testing would you like to see?
> >> >
> >> > Well, 100kb or so is a teeny amount on virtually any machine.  I'm
> >> > assuming the savings are (much) more significant once the machine gets
> >> > loaded up and doing work?
> >>
> >> So with clean kernel after boot we get 40 kb memory usage. With KASAN
> >> it is ~120 kb, which is 200% overhead. With KHWASAN it's 50 kb, which
> >> is 25% overhead. This should approximately scale to any amounts of
> >> used slab memory. For example with 100 mb memory usage we would get
> >> +200 mb for KASAN and +25 mb with KHWASAN. (And KASAN also requires
> >> quarantine for better use-after-free detection). I can explicitly
> >> mention the overhead in %s in the changelog.
> >>
> >> If you think it makes sense, I can also make separate measurements
> >> with some workload. What kind of workload should I use?
> >
> > Whatever workload people were running when they encountered problems
> > with KASAN memory consumption ;)
> >
> > I dunno, something simple.  `find / > /dev/null'?
> >
>
> Looking at a live Android device under load, slab (according to
> /proc/meminfo) + kernel stack take 8-10% available RAM (~350MB).
> Kasan's overhead of 2x - 3x on top of it is not insignificant.
> 

(top-posting repaired.  Please don't)

For a debugging, not-for-production-use feature, that overhead sounds
quite acceptable to me.  What problems is it known to cause?