Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180702201402.GA16773@whence.com>
References: <1530302661-20953-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
 <CAGXu5jKXtq75+HkziTT-8F0VHvvOiRrtfez60h8hKK1GaE64ug@mail.gmail.com> <20180702201402.GA16773@whence.com>
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:46:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLKKjf8BOj++4sgayU1N7Q9vMewyJX8o6_JkboPm5qEag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY does not need to
 select BUG
To:     Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Kamal,

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:27:08PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Do the lkdtm tests for usercopy correctly halt the kernel thread if
>> CONFIG_BUG is removed?
>
> Yes, they do...

Perfect, thanks for double-checking! I'll apply this to my tree.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security