Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1280431imm; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:28:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcxYrPTZBMwwdpcXettwlYptJDkDk6pTx1Tq4Cl9VveTgTOI9i38mFWYVoKDlA4pN2YAwnQ X-Received: by 2002:a62:4015:: with SMTP id n21-v6mr30171071pfa.198.1530631683791; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:28:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530631683; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aezGfb3MkTwRD2ZKRniQzpQO9RVmUcUYyoZdmiDJHQjczyAy1d+PuNciosWakjnRdM gAg/qZEKzrIg9QEzXZc7Ml887f1ZI6HHT0Ej0XvGFXJtf9l0Xg5M/KZtjlY10XRHtFVD cY4vn4nyKNnMvGgnONovIg1O29Kcvuz6FBsl7Xibp3DQjtlxj1DZxg6GWJNCbIaas6jn oTe5QLwe0bLNUdJFA/alGgn37fTVKS8aM3bs3arlmY6ETCLMzp4wEOSgFpsIgWEPYt/y PsCyclmUsO7UJEMFFJU/AS6aa4j1fbJtLitHFyCXCdC+7BLDFR0MzqAqpD7tg9nwZOaL F/Sg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=wFnWVwS+veymSfKHsWqOrcRV6uJ4vpps+GvMoIH0azg=; b=zLqa9ootD/D8oEeEueD6UFtg+Zhpur2X+TcUf/8b1gTH++v2pLuVwR8XNlWOakghuk iJRiNvPAMHXNeZX0mFCLYTKKcrhG6YUYotg5iRDdthXGvWihy08w+1i1dYAhhkrpqw3K 7uv3dSBRe01asbZj7wr3r2d0kej1JtPyQUodvd3rpoKNrD+UhKBnqUUah34EYvAMEKF7 S/a1Yer06LTeeTkEIunlK0w1pKKok6Au4AXd8i89xddYjyTeK4ied4lvgE4/y07C5MrR zO3zFU7zvHjDz/tU5MBotcjg2iFP44uFBOv87x4CX6SYJxjtKexG344d/xDPaSHsex0O 3PpQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g11-v6si1239598pgf.386.2018.07.03.08.27.49; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932541AbeGCP1G (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:27:06 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:60124 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753341AbeGCP1E (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:27:04 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w63FO0iD083568 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:27:03 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k0a3hnd2g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 11:27:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:27:02 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.20) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:26:59 -0600 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w63FQwP04129270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:26:58 -0700 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6678066; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:26:58 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651027805C; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:26:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [9.85.176.219]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:26:56 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: trusted: Find tpm_chip and use it until module shutdown From: James Bottomley To: Jarkko Sakkinen , Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:26:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20180626193040.2509798-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180626193040.2509798-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18070315-0036-0000-0000-00000A0A6B40 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009301; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01055994; UDB=6.00541664; IPR=6.00833916; MB=3.00021977; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-07-03 15:27:01 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18070315-0037-0000-0000-000047F8A03A Message-Id: <1530631615.3142.6.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-03_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=648 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807030176 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 18:24 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: [...] > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > > Is James maintaining this now? Have not seen his feedback yet... Hey, I thought we both were ... However, it looks fine to me Reviewed-by: James E.J. Bottomley James