Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1300771imm; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeEQemZC9at0wgwdE6lOJtukMUdSmJLBuE3JpHNutg4CG0cxMN7xV7f1yh1sfV/We7NhA3w X-Received: by 2002:a65:4acd:: with SMTP id c13-v6mr21289290pgu.436.1530632909675; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530632909; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=syupAF2BdzHnNSaxEJTx+orbZvjvpJ20uPWYoT5+R4K15rpPOyss68nsIbjgFZFruu Mvv+SXDWe2LtXqwUike7CWkoyEc2Jieh10mqDcdumilFdnmIoeHRMTDomKFsijomGKyf 7niX2R2CQG2vXT6Z/J2dADyZJvHW3LQdBJsiTtmM6XjxMtGO16TOSP4icQAg68sZaK+q 5qzyyb+DzvaDSF6EBS8NxWay/dfmFXAJSAlShxmvpQ4B7rYopOlrsKZlxLGbSL64L1t+ 9tANRAIb5xFZH15jdPtD5EL154GjoTxEtpKtknzKGxUUfDHl3kTeYBWe8Xk/B7XNlBfx 7f4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=NYtgD7zn9yg2dQjcXD0huLkS89N8S4LNFPb6cSqrwrs=; b=dlIrda8z/EhtxlUGvd5rvWiFTTXt8OoIqgeF3EpScUrNzTj0NvxJqCeBPn5kK6p+QC VH1qFFJJDEN1ln7IHMjoZa+521LinPkk98WECRKxWg6zKFocdaUB+s1AKGagZPIAI28K oZT5vo6ZS2WkPO6uNkHWlcj0ojjK/V6/lrs7JRGYpHs7hFnPm8fCa1ZD8/Fng6uCs/wI W/VgNWV1fXc/k5T1DerwI5/F/EVYlesnte86tcqRBz4yoBG9cdtVuHScYfQ+RqCbRu+8 HmAiLPDwTNK9JK/QGSvIiLuEe84nJMWErovpV9qPpvxco5ScLJCV6M/aAj++L/AkLPAX 4mkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kkhrFO7+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ay6-v6si1320831plb.210.2018.07.03.08.48.15; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kkhrFO7+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933117AbeGCPqn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:46:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:34235 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932392AbeGCPqm (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:46:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id a12-v6so2483452wro.1 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NYtgD7zn9yg2dQjcXD0huLkS89N8S4LNFPb6cSqrwrs=; b=kkhrFO7+0ElNuSFm+gKeEOwA6RI6U8NEnpTPfKyi4ItyFDOnp1wGwVPXLCOWxvtU1w LP/YGqqko+ZD1vH6+gDsEcXYNPRVJ2j9d7tvXOOpRjqtV+jxQr+b+xyJx2BazBhUZhjR 34EAL4XlgkJ0v5/AmihMynDou50ds+0Y6RtREEyFZSTCareGO0vyTW7h20hDCLbWy6K7 Q7+OCLM0hNMKhn3Rc1e0wQhOjex4SJXPNOu9w3ZZiFrsHK2oQJihT24FkHlzgk+DHuGE kUfgdqxF9sMP9fO5C6AnjS5qxum5M3IlB7/QxIl4971KbiHiA4/5O8E+PF2pxNrMEeC5 dN9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NYtgD7zn9yg2dQjcXD0huLkS89N8S4LNFPb6cSqrwrs=; b=VajFsQG9p1h4U36EQKQjP4Dgi+CgqQntUaE2x0et1NVLO9caJEINROI/mKUYjj0X4F PUmPT8kk5NlhJxDsVF4SJ5Vdv9+SyLHFFy4V9Wqc+QSJTiK0CmTpmnQeJfMPoCRZlseZ vWCxtp+vmJXHDQamnNhtooJZpIKi4DBTeSHXUYRXoDE6c2MB8KOldvIg8UTVlNjIoFG6 5jzBpXCyW2sNU3uF7AMhDRCcp5NItVk8x/PQDYXMUpg6xC80y23ulxUmBup67I9wlVI+ vrKsF/jeIGfRijNJvuf8Swd9keocikKIyHEgY/d/u4OA6TzcuUB5ZurMT5FLZCt7CFjY fyOA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2255lvyv7kOATQlYAaO4iQT1r1VyF0bWNr2szk6eS5t3XQKuv+ SROPxq7QS2GKcf/HFbmx10TLBlMe1SDItb447J2sFA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b3d4:: with SMTP id x20-v6mr23572404wrd.272.1530632800511; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:46:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <153063036670.1818.16010062622751502.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <153063054586.1818.6041047871606697364.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20180703152723.GB21590@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20180703152723.GB21590@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Shakeel Butt Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:46:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/17] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Kirill Tkhai , Vladimir Davydov , Alexander Viro , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Thomas Gleixner , Philippe Ombredanne , stummala@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Stephen Rothwell , Roman Gushchin , mka@chromium.org, Tetsuo Handa , Chris Wilson , longman@redhat.com, Minchan Kim , Huang Ying , Mel Gorman , jbacik@fb.com, Guenter Roeck , LKML , Linux MM , lirongqing@baidu.com, Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages; > > static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list); > > static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem); > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM > > +static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr); > > +static int shrinker_nr_max; > > So ... we've now got a list_head (shrinker_list) which contains all of > the shrinkers, plus a shrinker_idr which contains the memcg-aware shrinkers? > > Why not replace the shrinker_list with the shrinker_idr? It's only used > twice in vmscan.c: > > void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker) > { > down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list); > up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > } > > list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) { > ... > > The first is simply idr_alloc() and the second is > > idr_for_each_entry(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, id) { > > I understand there's a difference between allocating the shrinker's ID and > adding it to the list. You can do this by calling idr_alloc with NULL > as the pointer, and then using idr_replace() when you want to add the > shrinker to the list. idr_for_each_entry() skips over NULL entries. > > This will actually reduce the size of each shrinker and be more > cache-efficient when calling the shrinkers. I think we can also get > rid of the shrinker_rwsem eventually, but let's leave it for now. Can you explain how you envision shrinker_rwsem can be removed? I am very much interested in doing that. thanks, Shakeel