Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1392911imm; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:18:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIQHusFnGgWKTRntDQRIHJFT3W+3lMSEOFEgsdYn45vvZLd6bI2xm5F2xBnQlRdqSNWVzIb X-Received: by 2002:a65:6007:: with SMTP id m7-v6mr25613812pgu.92.1530638285359; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:18:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530638285; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vj2tgpTSP8sjBXb7zawUrgo3C4P4cbhnoDxoMbO/DPTmOGuszh/wNsypOf8Vi/0dkr B28y0z5RgGsX0wfmW4IM2B930rCZ1LBKRq7rgiBMfO4iW3fQbXDxlFn1wxAAhooJZt2g tSkO0jMulzi9/s2ZVO1w/JYGOIDBvSgtmEFOh2GNUF3y2RJXIo0MfwFOMgVGgsbBQY6Y jcZsSu4C1EojWlMamjNj52BzdNLu96Pf7mCBHs5DPK5p022EV+27G7g0J2iqn2PU1tTa unh0qJ7sVJqS1fWV4O2fK/IOhOy68ofDW68J0VMbeeMrpFWIanv+Lg5WQeIg9pVcEDLc mObw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=ZFU0q2wMzcjQx5CXZOn7hFhPOQGqz4RUr3oKF55Ua+E=; b=Vwc6ntpYNni6Ljf/atZFcgEE+IQKFfZRb9p6bNUEQsO84TMzIQsw6WHeqnlI4o4Qu6 d12SGkD8ksF32p49p9D/bAuTWlZV60e6p8z5hlIrpJ9IPhj744UBHkA/547ReXbLyK6h EVguZo3c1AnJbFnm4TF5b853rNaQq605rjSCXXvd276TmzqY1k6oSm0fjFVJi8QByVIQ oMfWdlIATcEXj6MZzV6TE5RKUO5m+yVYzJzoQ1XkKz+g1wg8GmgYLLwZxOzDn6rqeSJs lHBQ5rGonWqxLqgpqxkkTJIq8ygfUtMkr3UtIE4O3K+LB4q1Rn+oE5HEQr06TAtMwd/Y 9gLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7-v6si1328240pgq.548.2018.07.03.10.17.50; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933666AbeGCRRH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:17:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33320 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751735AbeGCRRE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:17:04 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w63HENdQ003489 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:17:04 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k0a7esh9e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 13:17:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:17:03 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.20) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.136) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:16:58 -0600 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w63HGvVV2883854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:16:57 -0700 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6714C6055; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:16:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D0FC6057; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:16:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.18.235.193]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:16:57 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:16:55 -0300 From: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" Cc: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Neuling , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Akshay Adiga , Shilpasri G Bhat , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Detect the presence of big-cores via "ibm, thread-groups" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18070317-0020-0000-0000-00000E395515 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009301; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01056031; UDB=6.00541686; IPR=6.00833953; MB=3.00021978; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-07-03 17:17:01 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18070317-0021-0000-0000-00006227BF3D Message-Id: <20180703171655.GA6474@kermit-br-ibm-com.br.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-03_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807030196 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:33:50PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > On IBM POWER9, the device tree exposes a property array identifed by > "ibm,thread-groups" which will indicate which groups of threads share a > particular set of resources. > > As of today we only have one form of grouping identifying the group of > threads in the core that share the L1 cache, translation cache and > instruction data flow. > > This patch defines the helper function to parse the contents of > "ibm,thread-groups" and a new structure to contain the parsed output. > > The patch also creates the sysfs file named "small_core_siblings" that > returns the physical ids of the threads in the core that share the L1 > cache, translation cache and instruction data flow. > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy > --- > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 8 ++ > arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h | 22 +++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 35 +++++++ > 4 files changed, 175 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu > index 9c5e7732..53a823a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu > @@ -487,3 +487,11 @@ Description: Information about CPU vulnerabilities > "Not affected" CPU is not affected by the vulnerability > "Vulnerable" CPU is affected and no mitigation in effect > "Mitigation: $M" CPU is affected and mitigation $M is in effect > + > +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]+/small_core_sibings s/small_core_sibings/small_core_siblings By the way, big_core_siblings was mentioned in the introductory email. > +Date: 03-Jul-2018 > +KernelVersion: v4.18.0 > +Contact: Gautham R. Shenoy > +Description: List of Physical ids of CPUs which share the the L1 cache, > + translation cache and instruction data-flow with this CPU. > +Values: Comma separated list of decimal integers. > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h > index d71a909..33226d7 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h > @@ -23,11 +23,13 @@ > extern int threads_per_core; > extern int threads_per_subcore; > extern int threads_shift; > +extern bool has_big_cores; > extern cpumask_t threads_core_mask; > #else > #define threads_per_core 1 > #define threads_per_subcore 1 > #define threads_shift 0 > +#define has_big_cores 0 > #define threads_core_mask (*get_cpu_mask(0)) > #endif > > @@ -69,12 +71,32 @@ static inline cpumask_t cpu_online_cores_map(void) > return cpu_thread_mask_to_cores(cpu_online_mask); > } > > +#define MAX_THREAD_LIST_SIZE 8 > +struct thread_groups { > + unsigned int property; > + unsigned int nr_groups; > + unsigned int threads_per_group; > + unsigned int thread_list[MAX_THREAD_LIST_SIZE]; > +}; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > int cpu_core_index_of_thread(int cpu); > int cpu_first_thread_of_core(int core); > +int parse_thread_groups(struct device_node *dn, struct thread_groups *tg); > +int get_cpu_thread_group_start(int cpu, struct thread_groups *tg); > #else > static inline int cpu_core_index_of_thread(int cpu) { return cpu; } > static inline int cpu_first_thread_of_core(int core) { return core; } > +static inline int parse_thread_groups(struct device_node *dn, > + struct thread_groups *tg) > +{ > + return -ENODATA; > +} > + > +static inline int get_cpu_thread_group_start(int cpu, struct thread_groups *tg) > +{ > + return -1; > +} > #endif > > static inline int cpu_thread_in_core(int cpu) > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c > index 40b44bb..a78ec66 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c > @@ -402,10 +402,12 @@ void __init check_for_initrd(void) > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > int threads_per_core, threads_per_subcore, threads_shift; > +bool has_big_cores = true; > cpumask_t threads_core_mask; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(threads_per_core); > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(threads_per_subcore); > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(threads_shift); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(has_big_cores); > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(threads_core_mask); > > static void __init cpu_init_thread_core_maps(int tpc) > @@ -433,6 +435,108 @@ static void __init cpu_init_thread_core_maps(int tpc) > > u32 *cpu_to_phys_id = NULL; > > +/* > + * parse_thread_groups: Parses the "ibm,thread-groups" device tree > + * property for the CPU device node dn and stores > + * the parsed output in the thread_groups > + * structure tg. Perhaps document the arguments of this function, as done in the second patch? > + * > + * ibm,thread-groups[0..N-1] array defines which group of threads in > + * the CPU-device node can be grouped together based on the property. > + * > + * ibm,thread-groups[0] tells us the property based on which the > + * threads are being grouped together. If this value is 1, it implies > + * that the threads in the same group share L1, translation cache. > + * > + * ibm,thread-groups[1] tells us how many such thread groups exist. > + * > + * ibm,thread-groups[2] tells us the number of threads in each such > + * group. > + * > + * ibm,thread-groups[3..N-1] is the list of threads identified by > + * "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" arranged as per their membership in > + * the grouping. > + * > + * Example: If ibm,thread-groups = [1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] it > + * implies that there are 2 groups of 4 threads each, where each group > + * of threads share L1, translation cache. > + * > + * The "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" of the first group is {5,6,7,8} > + * and the "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" of the second group is {9, 10, > + * 11, 12} structure > + * > + * Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if the property does not exist, > + * -ENODATA if property does not have a value, and -EOVERFLOW if the > + * property data isn't large enough. > + */ > +int parse_thread_groups(struct device_node *dn, > + struct thread_groups *tg) > +{ > + unsigned int nr_groups, threads_per_group, property; > + int i; > + u32 thread_group_array[3 + MAX_THREAD_LIST_SIZE]; > + u32 *thread_list; > + size_t total_threads; > + int ret; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dn, "ibm,thread-groups", > + thread_group_array, 3); > + > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + property = thread_group_array[0]; > + nr_groups = thread_group_array[1]; > + threads_per_group = thread_group_array[2]; > + total_threads = nr_groups * threads_per_group; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dn, "ibm,thread-groups", > + thread_group_array, > + 3 + total_threads); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + thread_list = &thread_group_array[3]; > + > + for (i = 0 ; i < total_threads; i++) > + tg->thread_list[i] = thread_list[i]; > + > + tg->property = property; > + tg->nr_groups = nr_groups; > + tg->threads_per_group = threads_per_group; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * get_cpu_thread_group_start : Searches the thread group in tg->thread_list > + * that @cpu belongs to. Same here. > + * > + * Returns the index to tg->thread_list that points to the the start > + * of the thread_group that @cpu belongs to. > + * > + * Returns -1 if cpu doesn't belong to any of the groups pointed > + * to by tg->thread_list. > + */ > +int get_cpu_thread_group_start(int cpu, struct thread_groups *tg) > +{ > + int hw_cpu_id = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); > + int i, j; > + > + for (i = 0; i < tg->nr_groups; i++) { > + int group_start = i * tg->threads_per_group; > + > + for (j = 0; j < tg->threads_per_group; j++) { > + int idx = group_start + j; > + > + if (tg->thread_list[idx] == hw_cpu_id) > + return group_start; > + } > + } > + > + return -1; > +} > + > /** > * setup_cpu_maps - initialize the following cpu maps: > * cpu_possible_mask > @@ -467,6 +571,7 @@ void __init smp_setup_cpu_maps(void) > const __be32 *intserv; > __be32 cpu_be; > int j, len; > + struct thread_groups tg = {.nr_groups = 0}; We assume has_big_cores = true but here we initialize .nr_groups otherwise. It's kind of contradictory. What if has_big_cores is assumed false and members of tg are initialized with zeroes? > > DBG(" * %pOF...\n", dn); > > @@ -505,6 +610,11 @@ void __init smp_setup_cpu_maps(void) > cpu++; > } > > + if (parse_thread_groups(dn, &tg) || > + tg.nr_groups < 1 || tg.property != 1) { > + has_big_cores = false; > + } > + parse_thread_groups() returns before setting tg.property if property doesn't exist. Are we confident that tg.property won't contain any garbage that could lead to a false positive here? Shouldn't we also initialize .property when declaring tg? What if this logic is encapsulated in a function? For example: has_big_cores = dt_has_big_cores(dn, &tg); > if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) { > of_node_put(dn); > break; > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c > index 755dc98..f5717de 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "cacheinfo.h" > #include "setup.h" > @@ -1025,6 +1026,33 @@ static ssize_t show_physical_id(struct device *dev, > } > static DEVICE_ATTR(physical_id, 0444, show_physical_id, NULL); > > +static ssize_t show_small_core_siblings(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, > + char *buf) > +{ > + struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev); > + struct device_node *dn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu->dev.id, NULL); > + struct thread_groups tg; > + int i, j; > + ssize_t ret = 0; > + > + if (parse_thread_groups(dn, &tg)) > + return -ENODATA; > + > + i = get_cpu_thread_group_start(cpu->dev.id, &tg); > + > + if (i == -1) > + return -ENODATA; > + > + for (j = 0; j < tg.threads_per_group - 1; j++) > + ret += sprintf(buf + ret, "%d,", tg.thread_list[i + j]); > + > + ret += sprintf(buf + ret, "%d\n", tg.thread_list[i + j]); > + > + return ret; > +} > +static DEVICE_ATTR(small_core_siblings, 0444, show_small_core_siblings, NULL); > + > static int __init topology_init(void) > { > int cpu, r; > @@ -1048,6 +1076,13 @@ static int __init topology_init(void) > register_cpu(c, cpu); > > device_create_file(&c->dev, &dev_attr_physical_id); > + > + if (has_big_cores) { > + const struct device_attribute *attr = > + &dev_attr_small_core_siblings; > + > + device_create_file(&c->dev, attr); > + } > } > } > r = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "powerpc/topology:online", > -- > 1.9.4 > Cheers Murilo