Received: by 2002:ac0:a581:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m1-v6csp1490897imm; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJSCzolotHnAgN0GGlZGLo5emDw4Rli9j4QyMCCrCwWr3/6leLBmnwzYdiuuuQZJAKNzaU0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb90:: with SMTP id m16-v6mr31217716pls.50.1530644922034; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530644922; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zHX2P1cr4JbUwcXhI7lu3HFHWJYHtW+lizFnt0CeSOBUSf+mtbjuSoRocC/XSmxJpF 3r7HVJDQRBFbUAQYst3YMFmUwobw0oTwWVFhmlmmilJjlh+jNEuc4cbugN0njakcoEcO a/rE2kM7MEoLVaps/GWdRwGWpkLHcFhDlcVcJQ1lSK2OzyM9PkqnsP/p0bG+CPXjt/Cj BOGl0qV7+ZTYTJUAhThlhaZ8N7kV8Y03FBdOKMxIWEkdrTM1ortSC7MIY6GGIwGA+2io uYfsbcJPIL8uKVckoHyYtV1Z9BsrUtIitYqq0w3n2OPYxVIvfktfKMxrs2zN3DZPFs1G u0HA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=U9vs2Qo83umLlaD0dHlTazcQxIr93nPRszOSQF16c6o=; b=YKKoBBq/95qDBeglQ5Y3T6iPddR2H1Rii+gtTiVr4ZEXZQbfm0UAg0rw89G3GSxHK7 T+4eD+jDi0fIB2F6B9XByROJ7gXuJq6Qv8Q7MWO1adRX5LQHj1W+MJwJp9IBNUOGiCmZ Q7a7nMgNA28w2Pfn0IZYByW2c2En0ojLHsYkRSudRyWfcdq2L390zl4tWhzyd5INT+Vs 38Ad3rv227mcbzYe8Fk1ziC1C8lScGMKuJ4AB9xIZfmXLB6ERjKJ1qYN+kAoazOcVHAe dM22tW9N0DqKx5voN4qumAJaU8gS7jDlsHdR2vJ7GsFQUIxTZEhLfTlJ5tJzJQn/b713 +oxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x17-v6si1557502pfi.329.2018.07.03.12.08.27; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 12:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934533AbeGCTGf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:06:35 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:55096 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932825AbeGCTGd (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:06:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w63J3jsP140833 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:06:33 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k0dpdk29x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 15:06:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:06:32 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.20) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:06:28 -0600 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w63J6R4S4718876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 12:06:27 -0700 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2149C78067; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:06:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E93278064; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:06:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [9.85.176.219]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:06:24 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: trusted: Find tpm_chip and use it until module shutdown From: James Bottomley To: James Morris , Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 12:06:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20180626193040.2509798-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180626193040.2509798-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1530631615.3142.6.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180703165102.GB19800@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18070319-0016-0000-0000-000009038497 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009302; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01056067; UDB=6.00541708; IPR=6.00833990; MB=3.00021979; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-07-03 19:06:30 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18070319-0017-0000-0000-00003F81061A Message-Id: <1530644783.3142.37.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-03_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=862 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807030216 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 04:51 +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:26:55AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > OK, I was not sure how that discussion went. I could add myself as > > co-maintainer to MAINTAINERS because I anyway need to go through > > all of these. > > > > If anyone does not vote against, I'll send a patch. > > > > For Keys?  That would would be useful to help reduce the workload on  > David. Well, no, this was for trusted keys, which is the part of the key infrastructure that goes via the TPM: The KEYS-TRUSTED part in the MAINTAINERs file. There's still KEYS-ENCRYPTED, KEYS/KEYRING and ASYMETRIC KEYS, which don't use the TPM. However, I've no objection to consolidating the lot under a larger set of maintainers ... I recently agreed to look at the asymmetric key TPM patch because it's my area, but it also strays over into crypto, keyring and asymmetric keys. James