Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261782AbTILRqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:46:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261784AbTILRqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:46:40 -0400 Received: from pf138.torun.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.76.207.138]:40205 "EHLO centaur.culm.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261782AbTILRqd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0400 From: Witold Krecicki To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SII SATA request size limit Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:46:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 References: <200309112357.41592.eu@marcelopenna.org> <1063363288.5330.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1063363288.5330.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <200309121946.31810.adasi@kernel.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1516 Lines: 30 Dnia pi? 12. wrze?nia 2003 12:41, Alan Cox napisa?: > On Gwe, 2003-09-12 at 03:57, Marcelo Penna Guerra wrote: > > In recent kernels, the siimage driver limits the max kb per request size > > to 15 (7.5kb). As I was having no problems with rqsize of 128 (64kb), I > > decided to comment out this part of the code and my system is rock solid. > > It will depend what disks you have. > > > kernels, so people can try to see if it's stable. I really don't beleive > > that I have such an unique hardware configuration, so this should benefit > > other people. > > You can up it again at runtime. I've lost some of mails about siimage on LKML, but Im' getting more and more confused about 'hangs' probably caused by siimage driver. I was using 15 rqsize, now 128 - doesn't matter. It happens in random moments - sometimes at boot time when drive is fscked, sometimes when I'm trying to copy large amount of data and sometimes without any particular reason after several hours. I've updated MB (a7n8x deluxe rev 2.0) BIOS but controller (which is on-board) bios seems to be untouched (4.1.25 or so ). Is there any controller BIOS update which I could miss? what can be other reason? -- Witold Kr?cicki (adasi) adasi [at] culm.net GPG key: 7AE20871 http://www.culm.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/