Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 17:07:45 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Luis Araneda <luaraneda@gmail.com>
Cc:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm: dts: zynq: remove "zynq" prefix from
 compatible property
Message-ID: <20180703230745.GA2129@rob-hp-laptop>
References: <20180628054205.17737-1-luaraneda@gmail.com>
 <20180628054205.17737-6-luaraneda@gmail.com>
 <042f6632-f4f6-d278-9859-b8998468c3bf@xilinx.com>
 <CAHbBuxpuAC0PDfFBQ+D_zJu-AmWFNhEWCojr8LAWfO-ootLqEg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHbBuxpuAC0PDfFBQ+D_zJu-AmWFNhEWCojr8LAWfO-ootLqEg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:18:49AM -0400, Luis Araneda wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:42 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > zynq name here is correct which is saying that hardblock is going to be
> > described. Without it it is suggesting that hardblock is not used and it
> > is for example on zybo with microblaze.
> 
> In my opinion, the zynq name is just adding redundant information to
> the "xlnx,zynq-7000" value.

Maybe so, but you can't just go around changing compatible strings. Once 
set, it's an ABI.

Rob