Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 18:21:49 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: replace u64 with phys_addr_t where
 appropriate
References: <1530637506-1256-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20180703125722.6fd0f02b27c01f5684877354@linux-foundation.org>
 <063c785caa11b8e1c421c656b2a030d45d6eb68f.camel@perches.com>
 <20180704070305.GB4352@rapoport-lnx>
 <20180704075449.GB458@jagdpanzerIV>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180704075449.GB458@jagdpanzerIV>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Message-Id: <20180704152148.GK4352@rapoport-lnx>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 04:54:49PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (07/04/18 10:03), Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >  arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c             | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >  arch/arm/mm/alignment.c                   |  2 +-
> >  arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c                 |  2 +-
> >  arch/microblaze/mm/pgtable.c              |  2 +-
> >  arch/sparc/kernel/ds.c                    |  2 +-
> >  arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c                    |  2 +-
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h   |  2 +-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c                  |  2 +-
> >  arch/x86/mm/extable.c                     |  4 ++--
> >  arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c                 |  2 +-
> 
> Isn't it "funny" that parisc, ia64, powerpc don't use pf/pF in arch code,
> but x86, arm, etc. do use pf/pF in arch code?
> 
> Surely, I do understand why we have pf/pF in mm, drivers and all over the
> place. But still, I'm surprised.

That's because somebody (including you) did the conversion ;-)
 
> 	-ss
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.