Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261935AbTILXKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:10:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261941AbTILXKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:10:05 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:35560 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261935AbTILXKA (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:10:00 -0400 From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:09:58 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH][IDE] update qd65xx driver Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1102 Lines: 31 From B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl Fri Sep 12 00:44:48 2003 > That reminds me, did I ever send you this? > > Andries No, only similar patch for hpt366.c. I think the (almost) correct scheme is following ... Yes, larger changes are possible - and in fact I have a directory full of IDE stuff, polishing, cleanup, non-urgent. I sent this mainly because the hpt366.c analog was needed to prevent filesystem corruption (on my own system). Similarly, I imagine this patch is needed to prevent filesystem corruption - no need to wait until someone actually reports a corrupted filesystem. Patches that allow people to set lower PIO modes than the max may be nice, but are less urgent than preventing modes higher than the max. Andries > - pio = ide_get_best_pio_mode(drive, pio, 255, &d); > + pio = ide_get_best_pio_mode(drive, 255, pio, &d); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/