Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261905AbTIMEBq (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:01:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261910AbTIMEBq (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:01:46 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:13576 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261905AbTIMEBp (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:01:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:01:51 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: John Bradford , anthony.truong@mascorp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jamie@shareable.org, willy@debian.org Subject: Re: Memory mapped IO vs Port IO Message-ID: <20030913040151.GI30584@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: John Bradford , anthony.truong@mascorp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jamie@shareable.org, willy@debian.org References: <200309121641.h8CGflK0000145@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20030912215203.GF30584@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030912215203.GF30584@matchmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 511 Lines: 11 On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:52:03PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > If there's already a config option that keeps code from being compiled when > it's not used, then it should stay. Nevermind, after reading the whole thread I see how that doesn't make sense in this case. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/