Received: by 2002:ac0:a591:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m17-v6csp826290imm; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 09:31:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc8ZXZB3QDWVJRDLur51twBXcsDFePHQQgdNW+xUEyyTxiFDOnW1+iOhCfPuwO7A2NjBxXS X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:722:: with SMTP id 31-v6mr7042015pli.3.1530808262353; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:31:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530808262; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e2aOjXVmveHx/a5x2NLXAz4Nmt42VzFjFd+m7RV71/Jug8eQ6tcBfECJLDcYiqfAuV Kl32hNv2SOYJGxA2tAd//2hls7ZX4eJp/wNKutukVuEf4v3JfjqdFn2yvjlVvDQyzNb8 Gg9To5QZL+8aYzOVzWG/GUtgwzaBxibWD//J8/zFoQiCy6qpy8/QqHSedkFzQvjZsyoy vK/xU99sy94vnqeOPBA/szZmMpJrYFiT+MzCEL+3BMlg842++bkZoqtv4CSDf9guguyO IKBLlQCX/0rHc0oRt3E6u0wPIk/eAygtfDobR3dC36crZJq4TV+gaIc7ilWc7/B/tGBP ansQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=wfIs56SDKy7QlwZory55V3yk1FMTQh5Bd+uDH/5hhCo=; b=Yn3KYC4xXMtLsPJDFn3oIyStNsDwj6ssCfV0D+hCi7KTPE+t8JoIbUpOnDPxpI/pmJ mogACRIRXOZX357pj9lwtSPV9Nr5mVldVlBoX+xZrQg7r3xcmCFN4Yd79M7++OSYn+TC ikCSSS9Ir1KGdKjpZ71lPOZAo7QToPYiMxrLS78Sb5LPW6TcfSRAFiwwJ8tFcXHikq73 3VGReSQcySL/8jusiPI04cjhw6wtqFU0QIdQCheUzSC6cl+LWqAOLPPZTrcWEfZ9RSr4 bzCFy74WjFZCchF9tD/ZetnYrGjO1Khi/ReznL65cGRnIQKGxUoKYRxN7+lqN/l/xnf+ 7Ocg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm1 header.b=HNh80qev; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=hNz7X9KM; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y20-v6si6148785pfm.186.2018.07.05.09.30.46; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm1 header.b=HNh80qev; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=hNz7X9KM; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754397AbeGEQ2u (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:28:50 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:38529 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753829AbeGEQZS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:25:18 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B993721ABB; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:25:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Jul 2018 12:25:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=wfIs56SDKy7QlwZory55V3yk1FMTQh5Bd+uDH/5hhCo=; b=HNh80qev mxlAe0o+jS8R3cs3pADnWMKhrQTtrUIARtHX4B6gf64QGbEUY3PyUhqpuVZuPSfx rFCp1Y51yUtpQBvOxQRGw4q1TNfFwgsK1mlEYYujn2FOZyZ2on/GdMiyt7RVysWw 0/+Z0+6Tp4jwIrUi6vklr/yxMlQJaFbT1kcrg4ksfzTxkMe3ONaLKhhI6nxT5Hy+ rYdNJBzTANWELlDS+IZor3ceT28DlFc19jslxFPf2bFD8CDoTN4WyprxcX6la+QI 1oo8kSoPWwxE4bvumAyDAa5IjsUk+7C6HYJtOQgvgMvSC9c8iVudga9c0JaBXAJb LHJxBHA0GxEVxw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wfIs56SDKy7QlwZory55V3yk1FMTQ h5Bd+uDH/5hhCo=; b=hNz7X9KM/Z/h8TGT6Es1SEhHzypXHqrLf1NbhhTZSyIsR LzFbOFpOaDPkdIZt/MrVZ9n//nO08FzahMLnwAZ/az6Oi8F0yrsFssC/XmK2XjRQ suUgyCA8nYXR1cEl1R/DWuGwv1rGEHj60J6tBadvKxlqieXfqgQZ8KtbW+30EjGw EN83sv7BFuIu/MLB7KdKdinU3F0+DjaLXAWh+cMeyWHquCSJH9nGurCsikkL6uxj JsYnlXVwwX4PxRqU07iXjHWZpegInFYNWQChrB24rbvCcE8iiQePMK1w4Bham8Eu ZXvUL2N0Tr1e0JmROqCOtf8T390aSV0I1zoikzQMg== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (d57d388d.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.56.141]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9D7FDE405A; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:25:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:25:15 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Stefan Bader Cc: Eric Sandeen , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held Message-ID: <20180705162515.GB18499@kroah.com> References: <20100730171510.105264205@clark.site> <4C56B45E.9010601@canonical.com> <4C56FA35.7060607@redhat.com> <20100802184806.GA16878@kroah.com> <20100807040732.GB16342@khazad-dum.debian.net> <4C5D61E7.9090008@redhat.com> <4C5FC3BB.4030602@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5FC3BB.4030602@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:00:43AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 08/07/2010 03:38 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>>> On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: > >>>>> We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch > >>>>> mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet. > >>>>> Do you know what happened to that? > >>>> right, patch below is needed to fix things. > >>>> > >>>> Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165 > >>>> for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon... > >>> I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet. > >>> > >>> And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert > >>> and do a new release? > >> > >> Any answers on this? > >> > > > > Yes, I'd revert it for now, I'm afraid, if the other patch isn't upstream > > yet. > > > > Sorry about that, > > > > -Eric > > Upstream as of now (same SHA1 as in linux-next): > > >From 437f88cc031ffe7f37f3e705367f4fe1f4be8b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eric Sandeen > Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:33:29 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] (pre-stable) ext4: fix freeze deadlock under IO That is a patch from 2010, are you sure this is what you are looking for? confused, greg k-h