Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:53:43 +0200
From:   "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@st.com>,
        "lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: core: Link consumer with regulator driver
Message-ID: <20180705175343.GB29378@kroah.com>
References: <1530800748-7300-1-git-send-email-p.paillet@st.com>
 <1530800748-7300-3-git-send-email-p.paillet@st.com>
 <20180705165351.GD6227@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180705165351.GD6227@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:53:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:25:56PM +0000, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote:
> > From: pascal paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
> > 
> > Add a device link between the consumer and the driver so that
> > the consumer is not suspended before the driver. The goal is to avoid
> > implementing suspend_late ops in regulator drivers.
> 
> This looks good but I'll wait for Greg's review of the link
> functionality - Greg, is it OK to apply this via the regulator tree or
> do you want a shared branch?

You can take it through the regulator tree, no objection from me:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>