Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 4/4] arm64: Add build salt to the vDSO
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc:     Mark Wielaard <mjw@fedoraproject.org>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
        Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
References: <20180703233430.14416-1-labbott@redhat.com>
 <20180703233430.14416-5-labbott@redhat.com>
 <CAK7LNARxwNkzkUif9dj1oVFGYP4J41C+t=W4YFVxM+J94siGvA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <33c28c0a-e429-51ea-0428-26fcfafa61bb@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:05:38 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARxwNkzkUif9dj1oVFGYP4J41C+t=W4YFVxM+J94siGvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 07/03/2018 08:55 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> 2018-07-04 8:34 GMT+09:00 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>:
>>
>> The vDSO needs to have a unique build id in a similar manner
>> to the kernel and modules. Use the build salt macro.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> v5: I was previously focused on x86 only but since powerpc gave a patch,
>> I figured I would do arm64 since the changes were also fairly simple.
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/note.S | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/note.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/note.S
>> index b82c85e5d972..2c429dfd3f45 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/note.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/note.S
>> @@ -22,7 +22,10 @@
>>   #include <linux/uts.h>
>>   #include <linux/version.h>
>>   #include <linux/elfnote.h>
>> +#include <linux/build-salt.h>
>>
>>   ELFNOTE_START(Linux, 0, "a")
>>          .long LINUX_VERSION_CODE
>>   ELFNOTE_END
>> +
>> +BUILD_SALT;
> 
> 
> 
> I think this works, but
> I prefer no-semicolon in assembly files.
> 
> For coding consistency,
> I want ';' as statement delimiter in .c files.
> But, only new line after each statement in .S files.
> 
> For example, in arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
> I see no semicolon after ELFNOTE().
> 
> I found this:
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0473k/dom1359731141352.html
> It says ';' starts a comment line
> although it is not the case of GAS.
> 
> 
> Same for 3/4.
> 
> 
> 

Yes, that was a typo out of habit. Will fix.