Received: by 2002:ac0:a591:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m17-v6csp1799678imm; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:47:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcF1b1qsLM6/EGMcPbEjljtF30b8jrvaZnuBkgWfmGfD21TKNk23oAaZTCl6ePjxq4geogM X-Received: by 2002:a63:3686:: with SMTP id d128-v6mr9224898pga.18.1530884867238; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 06:47:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530884867; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mb7CJcMfyB8DTYyeP8yzaInoUrxmZZW31EZdCNOJmICJTUkf/3EoFUSZOF27hL3SZj Pn5lwvPGiicNAzmjLMTVBMbxAUILLMlKfSdMx5zqgWfds3ZDH5iUZfAPUSCrhlyAbPuM FL+h/mUHLMkPRXwvIAumJ6jP1WcGjwPoWMTJAaF8Cr3PvDjZ0mko9xAsFF3D2LEgUQIs E81UG34ht1rjaYBwdL5R+RCSohDbc3qLQfdKjxKlf5DmFrhVBcy+pxyQ+YR2SPUkDilA AllOJw4jjAMW8fYXf9ykzaZlbX/7ZDOFoPo6FUBuas9JiVbhO2caCw8jFjQwBAt2jchx z/Uw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=uuahflG8xI5DvvznQoeiK61T30Yu2/952ui3E+CcEeg=; b=qku3Tv/Sv8KCpNPjt9YJUU7FFcWr5tX1X1WoWnU/+wgFeQ1CmhPRgf5dsPty/Rti5L k3ArHosSE93Dprw2X71TxzuIogiye4IPCONafLdDdBZdOK8k3QVT6Pi0FNdwqeOf62WN DZjyZMf5SxxMczijzF/Ic5hikbYmCnR4CjVcHB2ZMbwrZHN//FjjZ1ZGA6m1PDPSwb0X kAxLVqoqeDzahlFfAOr0dZ19pgHathp4iQBSCwPlcBKbQ/PJ7vg3YTkOtloTD0kUhHZB 9MpeyZ0N33+VBAYTZbncXzgCh3cJcBc7OUcro3QDYDUNG+zp6rAtcowS4eG+gynXkJRi 1d+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f28-v6si8971798pfh.33.2018.07.06.06.47.31; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 06:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753854AbeGFNqx (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:46:53 -0400 Received: from smtp2200-217.mail.aliyun.com ([121.197.200.217]:57657 "EHLO smtp2200-217.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753605AbeGFNqw (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:46:52 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE;BC=0.08599114|-1;CH=green;FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01542;MF=ren_guo@c-sky.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=12;RT=12;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.CN6DRWy_1530884776; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:ren_guo@c-sky.com fp:SMTPD_---.CN6DRWy_1530884776) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(10.147.44.145); Fri, 06 Jul 2018 21:46:16 +0800 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 21:46:16 +0800 From: Guo Ren To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, arnd@arndb.de, c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com, gnu-csky@mentor.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, wbx@uclibc-ng.org, green.hu@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 11/19] csky: Atomic operations Message-ID: <20180706134616.GA25190@guoren> References: <860b8db036b33d7b3648cb1f4ec827a53dc1a01b.1530465326.git.ren_guo@c-sky.com> <20180705180008.GG2530@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180706114812.GC27148@guoren> <20180706120532.GX2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180706120532.GX2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:05:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:48:12PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:30:14AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LDSTEX > > > > +ENTRY(csky_cmpxchg) > > > > + USPTOKSP > > > > + mfcr a3, epc > > > > + INCTRAP a3 > > > > + > > > > + subi sp, 8 > > > > + stw a3, (sp, 0) > > > > + mfcr a3, epsr > > > > + stw a3, (sp, 4) > > > > + > > > > + psrset ee > > > > +1: > > > > + ldex a3, (a2) > > > > + cmpne a0, a3 > > > > + bt16 2f > > > > + mov a3, a1 > > > > + stex a3, (a2) > > > > + bez a3, 1b > > > > +2: > > > > + sync.is > > > > + mvc a0 > > > > + ldw a3, (sp, 0) > > > > + mtcr a3, epc > > > > + ldw a3, (sp, 4) > > > > + mtcr a3, epsr > > > > + addi sp, 8 > > > > + KSPTOUSP > > > > + rte > > > > +END(csky_cmpxchg) > > > > +#else > > > > > > Please explain... if the CPU has LDEX/STEX, then _why_ do you need this? > > Our libc use csky_cmpxchg and we want it compatible. Of course, we'll > > also implement the ldex/stex atomic operations in libs in future. > > I would strongly suggest not providing this syscall on SMP systems from > the get go. There is no point in starting with legacy problems without > an actual legacy. Ok.