Received: by 2002:ac0:a591:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m17-v6csp1930256imm; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 08:55:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfM9FEpOA9T/YUDwvB8Gejjt5PuRuU9+El5/ZoG4aQQCdFnEzo6DlCSxDjTZDwXzvxABenh X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:650c:: with SMTP id b12-v6mr10843124plk.31.1530892552981; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1530892552; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w9T6AL1r1VPt7AkNsk4jmUjGYinBzpPGjAhPH7LNagN7IPgiFmw2Hul+MKj35jYlIA pYnCud7UnF88G6CovJzjQbvOiSTaLhBNYGSDliltzdwhmqSrM4HzIeIZ3OTe+1Urh9aN 4IE1Xn/vG2+QQImZmtTIAptV+pow9kjTKAAMvwBrzx7jT+JQZGiKrSscBqYdbvW8LsiW W/Chb2OqPMdyj7tIOPIPXvX+DHKVCptzmvYfi6sJpBTWpRUWxF+daZ32sm1/zaIFDskX X8cd4IP2aczfVG+pS195gztaieGDEYU9hnpBbaNz5OBnmwcmb4UqQbA49p0usveZsjNH IzMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=QDxKWWL5gtyW5bx1hFsAnqx/q+YvGUev2vloUdnCkTw=; b=vq/32nr4zHYGqZAQNpcCbdY4lEoRTnE6iPBUPJRB/XNJ0TWsDWArKenS9PKUys7IKH PLkd0Ci0qHaI/qGmCxNWbi3xe/9k2lGDPhfCpp2S5wI7VlML8dYEQ777DgrRAZWlqFKb V19IgC8/z6gFmVv8PBdyul1bhPGoPL0TTYCYELrLMRn33AZW1fZkHW92EE6wfp0a01SG g2B+/KKnUMGyAx3Dm1NExa3lLGm9NoUkmG2zq1lUMhmmqEQIu+h8KI4l4Of2U6NfmN8c MHZEi9LLg2NUYHDfrePNFelmKcN3m+3jimtCK9SPuKsBBrwou0qVazFQRq/Zq/QOXaEV vAQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cc1-v6si8741409plb.458.2018.07.06.08.55.38; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933637AbeGFPyI (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:54:08 -0400 Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:59140 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933042AbeGFPyG (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:54:06 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F1C1373B3 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B7BDA4E3 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:52:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id ED5C9DA4E0; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:52:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on antivirus1-rhel7.int X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.2 required=7.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, SMTPAUTH_US2,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158FDA7F1; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:52:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (sys.soleta.eu [212.170.55.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F76F4265A5C; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:54:02 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E1t=E9?= Eckl , Fernando Fernandez Mancera , "Pablo M. Bermudo Garay" , Felix Fietkau , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: fix NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TEE dependencies Message-ID: <20180706155401.7jwc5laxqvnfpiur@salvia> References: <20180706123805.2852900-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20180706124542.jybscbmzixyt4rx2@salvia> <20180706124827.xwho2rgu3jkk3hp5@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:45:42PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:37:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > With NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TEE=y and IP6_NF_IPTABLES=m, we get a link > >> > error when referencing the NF_DUP_IPV6 module: > >> > > >> > net/netfilter/xt_TEE.o: In function `tee_tg6': > >> > xt_TEE.c:(.text+0x14): undefined reference to `nf_dup_ipv6' > >> > > >> > The problem here is the 'select NF_DUP_IPV6 if IP6_NF_IPTABLES' > >> > that forces NF_DUP_IPV6 to be =m as well rather than setting it > >> > to =y as was intended here. Adding a soft dependency on > >> > IP6_NF_IPTABLES avoids that broken configuration. > >> > >> Applied to nf.git, thanks Arnd. > > > > Sorry, let me reconsider. > > > > We many need similar patches to other spots in 35bf1ccecaaa ? > > > > If so, it would be good to fix in the one go. > > I'm fairly sure that NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_LOG is safe, since > NF_LOG_IPV6 already depends on IP6_NF_IPTABLES. > > NF_SOCKET_IPV6 like NF_DUP_IPV6 does not depend on > IP6_NF_IPTABLES, so we may have a similar problem there, though > I have not come across that. I have done only a few hundred randconfig > builds since I started yesterday, so I may have missed something, > but I think this is safe because CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV6 is > used like a 'bool' symbol these days, we don't actually control building > a module with it, only a small portion in the nft_socket file. Thanks for explaining. Applied, thanks!