Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262279AbTINC6x (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:58:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262280AbTINC6x (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:58:53 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:19723 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262279AbTINC6v (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:58:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:40:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Erik Andersen cc: Timothy Miller , David Schwartz , Pascal Schmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model] In-Reply-To: <20030914015719.GA16947@codepoet.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2167 Lines: 59 Please Erik, Go have your "DADDY" write another legal letter for you and send it my way. I will be happy to shove it down your pie hole. There is a difference in blanket theift of the kernel API and any court will point out that "fair usage" is proper. PS how is your IRS media forensics gig going now that you do not have me on your side to help you do the dirty work of sneaking around people's hard drives. I was smart enough to never teach you what I knew you could never learn. Later! Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 04:58:03PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote: > > > > > > David Schwartz wrote: > > > > > However, some people seem to be arguing that the GPL_ONLY symbols > > > are in > > >fact a license enforcement technique. If that's true, then when they > > >distribute their code, they are putting additional restrictions not in the > > >GPL on it. That is a GPL violation. > > > > Agreed. GPL_ONLY is not a license restriction. It is a technical issue. > > I'll go even farther, and say that one might call the GPL_ONLY > symbols an "effective technological measure" that "effectively > controls access to a work" and "effectively protects a right of a > copyright owner ... in the ordinary course of its operation....". > Bypassing GPL_ONLY symbols, as recently advocated by David > Schwartz and Andre Hedrick, could be considered circumvention of > an effective technological measure. Remember Dmitry Sklyarov, > > -Erik > > -- > Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ > --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/