Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262297AbTINDxk (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:53:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262296AbTINDxj (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:53:39 -0400 Received: from smtp3.att.ne.jp ([165.76.15.139]:51084 "EHLO smtp3.att.ne.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262291AbTINDv7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:51:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1b7401c37a73$87b0e250$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> From: "Norman Diamond" To: Subject: 2.6.0-test5 vs. modem cards Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:51:36 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1053 Lines: 21 When inserting a modem card, 2.6.0-test5 continues to have problems which earlier 2.6.0-test versions had, which can be solved by booting 2.4.19. In file 8250_cs.c: Line 61, identifies itself as "serial_cs.c" instead of "8250_cs.c". Line 119 identifies itself as "serial_cs" instead of "8250_cs". My partial understanding of Linux PCMCIA operations yields a guess that line 119 is part of the cause for failure during execution, whereas line 61 only potentially confuses future maintainers. Later in the same source file, calls to register_serial() and unregister_serial() compile but fail during execution. Of course in order to make it execute in the first place I have to manually modprobe 8250_cs, because of the reason mentioned above. /var/log/messages gets reports that those symbols are unknown. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/