Message-Id: <200309140625.h8E6PMT24138@mail.osdl.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Nick's scheduler policy v15 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:17:15 +1000."
             <3F62FCBB.2020807@cyberone.com.au> 
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:25:22 -0700
From: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1033
Lines: 40

> 
> 
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Cliff White wrote:
> >
> >>> Hi,
> >>> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v15/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Here are results for several recent kernels for comparison.
> >> the sched-rollup-nopolicy tests are still running. Performance of v15 
> >> suffers as number of CPU's increase.
> >> At 8 cpu's, delta is noticeable vs stock -test5
> >> cliffw
> >>
> >
> > OK, so it hasn't crashed? Do you have the profiles up?
> 
> 
> Nevermind, I found them. It looks like its balancing way too much. I've
> a few ideas. I should be getting time on a NUMA box there at OSDL soon, 
> so I won't bother you with untested stuff. Thanks again for doing
> these.
> 
It's not a bother, my robot slaves do all the work. 
http://www.osdl.org/plm-cgi/plm

:)
cliffw

> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/