Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262345AbTINIT1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:19:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262347AbTINIT1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:19:27 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:1549 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262345AbTINITZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:19:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 09:19:22 +0100 From: Russell King To: Norman Diamond Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. modem cards Message-ID: <20030914091922.C20889@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Norman Diamond , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1b7401c37a73$87b0e250$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1b7401c37a73$87b0e250$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60>; from ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp on Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 12:51:36PM +0900 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 31 On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 12:51:36PM +0900, Norman Diamond wrote: > In file 8250_cs.c: > Line 61, identifies itself as "serial_cs.c" instead of "8250_cs.c". > Line 119 identifies itself as "serial_cs" instead of "8250_cs". > My partial understanding of Linux PCMCIA operations yields a guess that line > 119 is part of the cause for failure during execution, whereas line 61 only > potentially confuses future maintainers. Its going to get renamed back to serial_cs shortly. > Later in the same source file, calls to register_serial() and > unregister_serial() compile but fail during execution. Of course in order > to make it execute in the first place I have to manually modprobe 8250_cs, > because of the reason mentioned above. /var/log/messages gets reports that > those symbols are unknown. I have no idea how you managed that. The configuration subsystem does not allow you to build 8250_cs.c as a module without building 8250.c in some manner, and 8250.c provides those symbols. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/ Linux kernel maintainer of: 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/