Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262348AbTINItg (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:49:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262357AbTINItg (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:49:36 -0400 Received: from h80ad2542.async.vt.edu ([128.173.37.66]:27580 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262348AbTINItc (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:49:32 -0400 Message-Id: <200309140846.h8E8k3Sg025899@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: Andre Hedrick Cc: Erik Andersen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: freed_symbols [Re: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model]] In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:10:27 PDT." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1183125595P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:45:53 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1912 Lines: 55 --==_Exmh_-1183125595P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:10:27 PDT, Andre Hedrick said: > Nope, you made threats. On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Erik Andersen wrote: > I'll go even farther, and say that one might call the GPL_ONLY > symbols an "effective technological measure" that "effectively > controls access to a work" and "effectively protects a right of a to which you replied: On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:40:52 -0700, Andre Hedrick said: > Go have your "DADDY" write another legal letter for you and send it my > way. I will be happy to shove it down your pie hole. Erik postulates a "one MIGHT" legal argument, and gets threatened with bodily harm? I think you've given up any moral high ground regarding threats. You may want to just take a few days off - you're apparently not attached to the same reality as the rest of us: > If one reads ./include/linux/module.h > > It clearly states any license is acceptable. Maybe if you apply the Bible Code to it, it's clearly stated, but all I see is a reference that the MODULE_LICENSE macro will accept a parameter of "Proprietary", and then goes on to say "it's there so the module in question can be treated properly - just like a Jew in Warsaw in 1941 had to wear a star". There. I said it. The esteemed Mr Godwin says we're now free to get on with our lives. --==_Exmh_-1183125595P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE/ZCq+cC3lWbTT17ARAiAcAJ9Ix2J5OMED4F7r03Hhsa3G48cA/ACgsVIB vQA3Shr7Uf4Y+eDgMruaGrQ= =CN2a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1183125595P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/