Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp402117imm; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfYKjGzaXC+4GlSUYyaUe2vAPMHB/ajPUal1CfLGu1DkLyjow36WaKMsszfJFckvXutOcis X-Received: by 2002:a65:448a:: with SMTP id l10-v6mr18636891pgq.382.1531134250789; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531134250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LktjG+P3oVRBoO390msgjFFkEgENMgVfHDQSzd1FNOhWagd9l04+4w46eOLouDBEIM /GFsh7PtLb+VSf7F4V4K8NyYvHRBlq3+dh69ruGeyPGL6pEQyQNiXUI7b8fcAcrMZz9p w6ERHG3OaQL1RiCjs6P6sSN+uH4azhc8wmI07AAZtrhVegL3xa4lIIjjJy5V1AzKUud8 AwPM9DHi+y7/VILSR5GWSLg7nevonIl7YI9aN1yY/wBUk54ZqDY7SdRF2vNW0T2G65/5 y/KZ623c1iGyKNoiltzfsik/WGbvBRnB4bCnpzNKus8XDWEdHFceevK8cVN9TH/qdW3r 8CsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=cJiAMb6Q6DmV+Y69Ur6cz3hUb8brg/GrjRFg9kkI43o=; b=IkT0p9Jnegj3aJBr94M7xOI/l21younzBsxD7XHAJkaGxA0QGx30M1WSp95XEb0PL6 gqKZYzHivCpdgqJjB7p+NeIh40f4UTJKTVxakxQfyTYz5SEcVC3sYAZjaBcxnHO5h0pU WmVmxng2hetKjPUtMvKKsYn63wFma4lYh3Tfhy2ADS1RHq/uRnoby4Gk+E0hgeMlOPlV 1ap72V9cmwA5sCjEK5EH8Nva3vi9IG+CiEPyIesk+viIefxGiRclxBj1zRZ7u5uh6HfF FzwKYWCrcdzTrUpuxUduY2aYmhNN3FMdzTTZqvT3mOZnKzCSMpwb7vLd+bphOIWn5DWe odaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="oWB9Wm/g"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q7-v6si13962172pll.445.2018.07.09.04.03.50; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="oWB9Wm/g"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932622AbeGILCo (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Jul 2018 07:02:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:33656 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754438AbeGILCm (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2018 07:02:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r5-v6so1149018pgv.0 for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 04:02:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cJiAMb6Q6DmV+Y69Ur6cz3hUb8brg/GrjRFg9kkI43o=; b=oWB9Wm/gY0DCEjJ+of4R8n2AUQyh3Z2z3sTvqsYOGVzjKQnH4GCmAHFl7YWFRzbpN2 5s1E64z2tz4zLnJHX1G18AvnRRZ+9q6LgtsQxLcBPt6Enc9YsqKLxmEX/t9InDzOJXg+ o9B1vSmrPZf/fvOnfBtfZ2OZwk27G+9Kwa/U2xIfi3I0UO4Qy53LLx/cZ8t206HqMJa4 /n5vQvd1WbJH15ihuoxpNDAdfHJ8Q/MychT7Q3XpGQivfWusJHfrUDaJMVmNjrw7exoP X1O0JGQ9rq/dGgz2ZsDZFYZzmSYWL9qYG27X4/M6WLtAzUM6DpHxvbY1sNawj7HicHFa WALg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cJiAMb6Q6DmV+Y69Ur6cz3hUb8brg/GrjRFg9kkI43o=; b=kBJl58XgGGHVmZpN9NTtyR4TVtMRh+ysr/KKRx0vds42njHP7DxknmFlBnmrjXRiY/ FV0WgNzFD062TjCckqIMIzSowfF8RoDF4+rfqEHrhdy0MPY45PQ7UKZGcWzq7bR1irW8 3vBezUMRvGwIXHL6x6VZJU/mHlytlQwAktduSixzKfAV9ZzHMa1uvjvNAQduj6twrf03 FV49W9L0NCndEltCk74o8coG8QNpj7Xvtcm+JupG5/z2ZtYWS1+jnqe62UcKwpCY5aLB Z6I+VnZFG7xx85Sx7Z7rB8GOrZQmIs/VZX/3Sg+yMWelI+72Hnf4kUhOWT1ovcg91JVV CePQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1jIRyklxKi8Viiw3Lm09oBaST9uE7DGghg5d0Ul4/rkfZag6w/ 6J3TiH1hQXweWKZ4GHK8LkhpvnMdz8hLxwdLZ+ZFLw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:58c8:: with SMTP id e8-v6mr18162489pgu.96.1531134162032; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 04:02:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:90a:950a:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 04:02:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y3ekafcw.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <000000000000ccdf0605708a9ccc@google.com> <87y3ekafcw.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 13:02:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Write in _free_event To: Alexander Shishkin Cc: syzbot , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , jolsa@redhat.com, LKML , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , syzkaller-bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > syzbot writes: > >> Hello, >> >> syzbot found the following crash on: >> >> HEAD commit: b2d44d145d2a Merge tag '4.18-rc3-smb3fixes' of git://git.s.. >> git tree: upstream >> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=178cf50c400000 >> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2ca6c7a31d407f86 >> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a24c397a29ad22d86c98 >> compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental) >> >> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet. > > Is there a chance of getting a reproducer for this one? There is a chance. Frequently syzbot finds a reproducer after some time. What's the chance in this case I don't know. Since it happened only once so far, probably not too high. But there seems to be a good hint in the KASAN report: task was freed right inside of fork/copy_process, probably some error happened, but it seems to have been registered in some global list already and perf_release discovered it there. Does it make sense? Was it registered? What should have been prevented the task alive at the time of access?