Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1110028imm; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:37:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcGFsF4sbTC8e2ktxuMUIgs6VVNPbsaNHE65qHMpjk6X2xErxOq6152Arpq0om/RJre0ME5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1121:: with SMTP id d30-v6mr22975707pla.247.1531183077684; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 17:37:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531183077; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GOQT8KHgbzlump7uhAlU4EQfIBT0Zi00XmFYUcmXHFaA3FqpbZ298jBpbA/kPC80r2 EXyzZI8K0yG3bGiArz22gQLCsfUHvSiZDEpMv9CaSR0NE4sjLKFeN6oXXv0fHtZcCgsB xrKpovJOaubHBUvYCD4M/59REaWbSb4lzVEZHdDh+a9+n6pzOhAeJmGGSUr62t+HqXo2 Bci+NPmgezhhtPDSAe/DlpThBbVwQgB39ptZ0AnyXfT5QEl3AtTnsqyVG6rGZK6OQzFd F8i3y5gCrn/ymnSmO+Ya+Y1czRKU+mzDE9LBrdZ44z5yG9mY9HeUSO6lALnLcLmoSCYN qwPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=O7vFTC5uU8yLhLo8zkg8ayMhsB9Nj/JWWiqdmCXdDSc=; b=ihuv5xK9lD5ZBfSPyaFY7r3HpQOovKcxoPCQXhksQCapMbg/KKlrqjVfu38U2MSsEp uHRs5IyOsGzLODk2CHjOzpOvsInGJ30n6ZGvZynTWDSx9Wn3fpGtdIi1WLHBAEGrbv2W fW3uV+nWrlDDgDGywh5SZ64fvYS/9DOAIdcdSp/aMT9yWWyinel4GKJAN28OI+X180td f74Z8RhWJ3avfxGyOAsZUlmUaSpZ71SBaXHYKTJeXSg0ku/KvcHRsqJptENGkvlzE8og ldHl9c64W/a4dGcPVwrjO8kHCZzp56ZiILc5461uaYqrclwqVCHVTUm0oyAzqdh897Dw 5B8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p67-v6si5668687pfg.295.2018.07.09.17.37.42; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 17:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933206AbeGJAfu (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:35:50 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51002 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932858AbeGJAfr (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:35:47 -0400 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.9.92]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 205A1E24; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:35:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Guenter Roeck , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , syzkaller , Stephen Rothwell , David Miller , kbuild test robot Subject: Re: what trees/branches to test on syzbot Message-Id: <20180709173546.dc720ad918e5362b8be2e034@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <873735n3dy.fsf@xmission.com> <20180116173440.GA15893@kroah.com> <81a0eb59-c204-9e36-13b7-88c2ea99ceab@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20180626141602.GA17788@thunk.org> <876e38d9-95e5-0a93-9c26-7287151b8b53@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <8c9027d6-ead2-1cca-4410-c8dbbe4bf2ea@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 08:26:32 +0900 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > It seems that syzbot (experimentally ?) restarted testing linux-next. > > May I ask you to carry temporarily debug printk() patch at > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/E8M8WTqt034/OpadOICfCAAJ > for "INFO: task hung in __sb_start_write" case? > > The bug should be reproduced within a day if executed under syzbot environment. > Thus, I'm sure that we don't need to carry this patch for long. Sure, I can add that. Let's get the build warning sorted out first, please. Any old silly workaround will suffice in a developer-only debug patch.