Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 1vier1@web.de,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
References: <20180709151019.1336-1-manfred@colorfullife.com>
 <20180709200927.cnypbuyociatmxae@linux-r8p5>
From:   Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Message-ID: <be986d6d-4388-5d4e-e1cb-5ae28212d120@colorfullife.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:44:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180709200927.cnypbuyociatmxae@linux-r8p5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Davidlohr,

On 07/09/2018 10:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
>> @Davidlohr:
>> Please double check that I have taken the correct patches, and
>> that I didn't break anything.
>
> Everything seems ok.
>
> Patch 8 had an alternative patch that didn't change nowarn semantics for
> the rhashtable resizing operations (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/22/732),
> but nobody complained about the one you picked up (and also has 
> Michal's ack).
>
Which patch do you prefer?
I have seen two versions, and if I have picked up the wrong one, then I 
can change it.

--
     Manfred