Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1298665imm; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 22:31:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdozzZGHytKfvbvzrpYeveA7X+vSXYPhgl2VBJ01aZ3Go0LHTQUjpwrNcyBo2ziH0AFzyw6 X-Received: by 2002:a65:4d05:: with SMTP id i5-v6mr20936561pgt.58.1531200688540; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:31:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531200688; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sxcZ6U627ao+PVcfySKjUo/faxU72f6c2373u5DBU77JPyqCj3/OegpQ9aRKWCRSxO /OhYmfoPTRaRw6uFayeEZKqHCtZ3oyoUnbaWSgPN0oZ3A1+eOfxKG0TzS9NDnjuOH7Dr uMurZ2Gd3/SoK2XzTiroqzhKZ27d3I6FmZo+2GQtXejRHDvi05L+biE6r8wd0p9lZ20b MlOKk6Ku92hDSISPxOqCah/ntqkxBRwMYUz5mDlI5lD+EvrCW2++YNrZTmdzzEP/Nx4J G5AZLAW9/wVwgtoQFJeTw2iUo4TcGMEmL8l4GdGjqbJAu/Eg8r3iCKf4F8YMbKhPyisa 7okw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=Q8BlKXGsPp3DRZF1UUQ5UAt8AuNGECeGDOma/iBMhb4=; b=FTK++Y9GcnopUCtyoyGzJPKHSAVh8Sh7l+GKhirWAq2aFSvgR5yDSyK+FXOdjXffgG iN9Lrn1tYhhORUDInj4diZ4YUP9MjjcnQ+7ZtUII4MguqgvwQmc08GLOgl2jNCNR5+7E How9wc+ws4h5vdlvSQy5uxoWNvp0WvTgPFMgPwk6VqmejEELWvbj+mBBa22dCUogeXQ0 WmhI5COdmJpxuQbMxeml6SQNgNDY3XNu9km1jtTdn8BS7vMRBy41jO/sXfisla+MiPYk F5GAyx6O/75wBNjjahK0Pqe47H9dpVl8ez4sNQCxsZwJ1IA6wQVTous1Csm/wpXdAt5i YeDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z13-v6si15398802pgc.409.2018.07.09.22.31.13; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751053AbeGJFa0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:30:26 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:57937 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931AbeGJFaT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:30:19 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jul 2018 22:30:19 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,332,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="55320490" Received: from kemi-desktop.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.13.123]) ([10.239.13.123]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2018 22:30:17 -0700 Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression To: kernel test robot , SeongJae Park Cc: Jens Axboe , Jens Axboe , lkp@01.org, LKML References: <20180604055259.GF16472@yexl-desktop> From: kemi Message-ID: <1483bdb1-df0c-3b9c-43b9-4f477d00b097@intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:27:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180604055259.GF16472@yexl-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, SeongJae Do you have any input for this regression? thanks On 2018年06月04日 13:52, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -11.2% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > > > commit: 316ba5736c9caa5dbcd84085989862d2df57431d ("brd: Mark as non-rotational") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-4.18/block > > in testcase: aim7 > on test machine: 40 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz with 384G memory > with following parameters: > > disk: 1BRD_48G > fs: btrfs > test: disk_rw > load: 1500 > cpufreq_governor: performance > > test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser system. > test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/ > > > > Details are as below: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > ========================================================================================= > compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/kconfig/load/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase: > gcc-7/performance/1BRD_48G/btrfs/x86_64-rhel-7.2/1500/debian-x86_64-2016-08-31.cgz/lkp-ivb-ep01/disk_rw/aim7 > > commit: > 522a777566 ("block: consolidate struct request timestamp fields") > 316ba5736c ("brd: Mark as non-rotational") > > 522a777566f56696 316ba5736c9caa5dbcd8408598 > ---------------- -------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ > 28321 -11.2% 25147 aim7.jobs-per-min > 318.19 +12.6% 358.23 aim7.time.elapsed_time > 318.19 +12.6% 358.23 aim7.time.elapsed_time.max > 1437526 ± 2% +14.6% 1646849 ± 2% aim7.time.involuntary_context_switches > 11986 +14.2% 13691 aim7.time.system_time > 73.06 ± 2% -3.6% 70.43 aim7.time.user_time > 2449470 ± 2% -25.0% 1837521 ± 4% aim7.time.voluntary_context_switches > 20.25 ± 58% +1681.5% 360.75 ±109% numa-meminfo.node1.Mlocked > 456062 -16.3% 381859 softirqs.SCHED > 9015 ± 7% -21.3% 7098 ± 22% meminfo.CmaFree > 47.50 ± 58% +1355.8% 691.50 ± 92% meminfo.Mlocked > 5.24 ± 3% -1.2 3.99 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.idle% > 0.61 ± 2% -0.1 0.52 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.usr% > 16627 +12.8% 18762 ± 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.active_objs > 16627 +12.9% 18775 ± 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.num_objs > 57.00 ± 2% +17.5% 67.00 vmstat.procs.r > 20936 -24.8% 15752 ± 2% vmstat.system.cs > 45474 -1.7% 44681 vmstat.system.in > 6.50 ± 59% +1157.7% 81.75 ± 75% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_mlock > 242870 ± 3% +13.2% 274913 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_written > 2278 ± 7% -22.6% 1763 ± 21% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_free_cma > 4.75 ± 58% +1789.5% 89.75 ±109% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mlock > 88018135 ± 3% -48.9% 44980457 ± 7% cpuidle.C1.time > 1398288 ± 3% -51.1% 683493 ± 9% cpuidle.C1.usage > 3499814 ± 2% -38.5% 2153158 ± 5% cpuidle.C1E.time > 52722 ± 4% -45.6% 28692 ± 6% cpuidle.C1E.usage > 9865857 ± 3% -40.1% 5905155 ± 5% cpuidle.C3.time > 69656 ± 2% -42.6% 39990 ± 5% cpuidle.C3.usage > 590856 ± 2% -12.3% 517910 cpuidle.C6.usage > 46160 ± 7% -53.7% 21372 ± 11% cpuidle.POLL.time > 1716 ± 7% -46.6% 916.25 ± 14% cpuidle.POLL.usage > 197656 +4.1% 205732 proc-vmstat.nr_active_file > 191867 +4.1% 199647 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty > 509282 +1.6% 517318 proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages > 2282 ± 8% -24.4% 1725 ± 22% proc-vmstat.nr_free_cma > 357.50 +10.6% 395.25 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file > 11.50 ± 58% +1397.8% 172.25 ± 93% proc-vmstat.nr_mlock > 970355 ± 4% +14.6% 1111549 ± 8% proc-vmstat.nr_written > 197984 +4.1% 206034 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file > 357.50 +10.6% 395.25 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file > 192282 +4.1% 200126 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending > 7901465 ± 3% -14.0% 6795016 ± 16% proc-vmstat.pgalloc_movable > 886101 +10.2% 976329 proc-vmstat.pgfault > 2.169e+12 +15.2% 2.497e+12 perf-stat.branch-instructions > 0.41 -0.1 0.35 perf-stat.branch-miss-rate% > 31.19 ± 2% +1.6 32.82 perf-stat.cache-miss-rate% > 9.116e+09 +8.3% 9.869e+09 perf-stat.cache-misses > 2.924e+10 +2.9% 3.008e+10 ± 2% perf-stat.cache-references > 6712739 ± 2% -15.4% 5678643 ± 2% perf-stat.context-switches > 4.02 +2.7% 4.13 perf-stat.cpi > 3.761e+13 +17.3% 4.413e+13 perf-stat.cpu-cycles > 606958 -13.7% 523758 ± 2% perf-stat.cpu-migrations > 2.476e+12 +13.4% 2.809e+12 perf-stat.dTLB-loads > 0.18 ± 2% -0.0 0.16 ± 9% perf-stat.dTLB-store-miss-rate% > 1.079e+09 ± 2% -9.6% 9.755e+08 ± 9% perf-stat.dTLB-store-misses > 5.933e+11 +1.6% 6.029e+11 perf-stat.dTLB-stores > 9.349e+12 +14.2% 1.068e+13 perf-stat.instructions > 11247 ± 11% +19.8% 13477 ± 9% perf-stat.instructions-per-iTLB-miss > 0.25 -2.6% 0.24 perf-stat.ipc > 865561 +10.3% 954350 perf-stat.minor-faults > 2.901e+09 ± 3% +9.8% 3.186e+09 ± 3% perf-stat.node-load-misses > 3.682e+09 ± 3% +11.0% 4.088e+09 ± 3% perf-stat.node-loads > 3.778e+09 +4.8% 3.959e+09 ± 2% perf-stat.node-store-misses > 5.079e+09 +6.4% 5.402e+09 perf-stat.node-stores > 865565 +10.3% 954352 perf-stat.page-faults > 51.75 ± 5% -12.5% 45.30 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.avg > 316.35 ± 3% +17.2% 370.81 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.stddev > 15294 ± 30% +234.9% 51219 ± 76% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.min > 299443 ± 3% -7.3% 277566 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.stddev > 1182 ± 19% -26.3% 872.02 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.nr_load_updates.stddev > 1.22 ± 8% +21.7% 1.48 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.avg > 2.75 ± 10% +26.2% 3.47 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.max > 0.58 ± 7% +24.2% 0.73 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.stddev > 77148 -20.0% 61702 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg > 70024 -24.8% 52647 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min > 6662 ± 6% +61.9% 10789 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev > 80.45 ± 18% -19.1% 65.05 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.stddev > 76819 -19.3% 62008 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg > 70616 -23.5% 53996 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.min > 5494 ± 9% +85.3% 10179 ± 26% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev > 16936 -52.9% 7975 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.avg > 19281 -49.9% 9666 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.max > 15417 -54.8% 6962 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.min > 875.00 ± 6% -35.0% 569.09 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev > 40332 -23.5% 30851 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg > 35074 -26.3% 25833 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min > 3239 ± 8% +67.4% 5422 ± 28% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.stddev > 5232 +27.4% 6665 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg > 15877 ± 12% +77.5% 28184 ± 27% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max > 2530 ± 10% +95.9% 4956 ± 27% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.stddev > 2.52 ± 7% -0.6 1.95 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > 1.48 ± 12% -0.5 1.01 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_get_extent.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > 1.18 ± 16% -0.4 0.76 ± 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_search_slot.btrfs_lookup_file_extent.btrfs_get_extent.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write > 1.18 ± 16% -0.4 0.76 ± 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_file_extent.btrfs_get_extent.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__dentry_kill.dentry_kill.dput.__fput.task_work_run > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.evict.__dentry_kill.dentry_kill.dput.__fput > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dentry_kill.dput.__fput.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop > 0.90 ± 18% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_evict_inode.evict.__dentry_kill.dentry_kill.dput > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fput.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dput.__fput.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64 > 1.69 -0.1 1.54 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > 0.87 ± 4% -0.1 0.76 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__clear_extent_bit.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > 0.87 ± 4% -0.1 0.76 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > 0.71 ± 6% -0.1 0.61 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_state_bit.__clear_extent_bit.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write > 0.69 ± 6% -0.1 0.60 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_bit_hook.clear_state_bit.__clear_extent_bit.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need > 96.77 +0.6 97.33 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 0.00 +0.6 0.56 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.can_overcommit.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > 96.72 +0.6 97.29 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 43.13 +0.8 43.91 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > 42.37 +0.8 43.16 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.block_rsv_release_bytes.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write > 43.11 +0.8 43.89 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.block_rsv_release_bytes.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > 42.96 +0.8 43.77 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.block_rsv_release_bytes.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > 95.28 +0.9 96.23 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 95.22 +1.0 96.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 94.88 +1.0 95.85 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__vfs_write.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 94.83 +1.0 95.80 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64 > 94.51 +1.0 95.50 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write.ksys_write > 42.44 +1.1 43.52 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > 42.09 +1.1 43.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write > 44.07 +1.2 45.29 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > 43.42 +1.3 44.69 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > 2.06 ± 18% -0.9 1.21 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_search_slot > 2.54 ± 7% -0.6 1.96 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_dirty_pages > 1.05 ± 24% -0.5 0.52 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irqsave > 1.50 ± 12% -0.5 1.03 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_get_extent > 1.22 ± 15% -0.4 0.79 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_file_extent > 0.81 ± 5% -0.4 0.41 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size > 0.74 ± 24% -0.4 0.35 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lock_root_node > 0.74 ± 24% -0.4 0.35 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_tree_lock > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__dentry_kill > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.evict > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dentry_kill > 0.90 ± 18% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_evict_inode > 0.91 ± 18% -0.3 0.57 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exit_to_usermode_loop > 0.52 ± 20% -0.3 0.18 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_idle > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_work_run > 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__fput > 0.90 ± 18% -0.3 0.57 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dput > 0.51 ± 20% -0.3 0.18 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64 > 0.51 ± 20% -0.3 0.18 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry > 0.50 ± 21% -0.3 0.17 ± 16% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_secondary > 0.47 ± 20% -0.3 0.16 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state > 0.47 ± 19% -0.3 0.16 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.intel_idle > 0.61 ± 20% -0.3 0.36 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_tree_read_lock > 0.47 ± 26% -0.3 0.21 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prepare_to_wait_event > 0.64 ± 18% -0.2 0.39 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_read_lock_root_node > 0.40 ± 22% -0.2 0.21 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_path_blocking > 0.38 ± 23% -0.2 0.19 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.finish_wait > 1.51 ± 3% -0.2 1.35 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__clear_extent_bit > 1.71 -0.1 1.56 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need > 0.29 ± 25% -0.1 0.15 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_orphan_del > 0.27 ± 27% -0.1 0.12 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_del_orphan_item > 0.33 ± 18% -0.1 0.19 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queued_read_lock_slowpath > 0.33 ± 19% -0.1 0.20 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common_lock > 0.45 ± 15% -0.1 0.34 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand > 0.47 ± 16% -0.1 0.36 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_check_data_free_space > 0.91 ± 4% -0.1 0.81 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.clear_extent_bit > 1.07 ± 5% -0.1 0.97 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__set_extent_bit > 0.77 ± 6% -0.1 0.69 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_bit_hook > 0.17 ± 20% -0.1 0.08 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queued_write_lock_slowpath > 0.16 ± 22% -0.1 0.08 ± 24% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_inode > 0.21 ± 17% -0.1 0.14 ± 19% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_update_delayed_inode > 0.26 ± 12% -0.1 0.18 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_async_run_delayed_root > 0.52 ± 5% -0.1 0.45 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.set_extent_bit > 0.45 ± 5% -0.1 0.40 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_extent_state > 0.11 ± 17% -0.1 0.06 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw > 0.28 ± 9% -0.0 0.23 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_drop_pages > 0.07 -0.0 0.03 ±100% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw > 0.39 ± 3% -0.0 0.34 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_alloc_profile > 0.33 ± 7% -0.0 0.29 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_extent_delalloc > 0.38 ± 2% -0.0 0.35 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__set_page_dirty_nobuffers > 0.49 ± 3% -0.0 0.46 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pagecache_get_page > 0.18 ± 4% -0.0 0.15 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.truncate_inode_pages_range > 0.08 ± 5% -0.0 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_path_blocking > 0.08 ± 6% -0.0 0.06 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.truncate_cleanup_page > 0.80 ± 4% +0.2 0.95 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.can_overcommit > 96.84 +0.5 97.37 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 96.80 +0.5 97.35 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64 > 43.34 +0.8 44.17 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_inode_rsv_release > 43.49 +0.8 44.32 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.block_rsv_release_bytes > 95.32 +0.9 96.26 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_write > 95.26 +0.9 96.20 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_write > 94.91 +1.0 95.88 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__vfs_write > 94.84 +1.0 95.81 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_file_write_iter > 94.55 +1.0 95.55 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_buffered_write > 86.68 +1.0 87.70 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath > 44.08 +1.2 45.31 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata > 43.49 +1.3 44.77 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reserve_metadata_bytes > 87.59 +1.8 89.38 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock > 0.47 ± 19% -0.3 0.16 ± 13% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.intel_idle > 0.33 ± 6% -0.1 0.18 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_alloc_profile > 0.27 ± 8% -0.0 0.22 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.btrfs_drop_pages > 0.07 -0.0 0.03 ±100% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw > 0.14 ± 5% -0.0 0.12 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.clear_page_dirty_for_io > 0.09 ± 5% -0.0 0.07 ± 10% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irqsave > 0.17 ± 4% +0.1 0.23 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.reserve_metadata_bytes > 0.31 ± 7% +0.1 0.45 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.can_overcommit > 86.35 +1.0 87.39 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath > > > > aim7.jobs-per-min > > 29000 +-+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > 28500 +-+ +.. + +..+.. +.. | > |..+ +.+..+.. : .. + .+.+..+..+.+.. .+..+.. + + + | > 28000 +-+ + .. : + +. + + + | > 27500 +-+ + + | > | | > 27000 +-+ | > 26500 +-+ | > 26000 +-+ | > | | > 25500 +-+ O O O O O | > 25000 +-+ O O O O O O O O O > | O O O O O O O O | > 24500 O-+O O O O | > 24000 +-+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > [*] bisect-good sample > [O] bisect-bad sample > > > Disclaimer: > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software > design or configuration may affect actual performance. > > > Thanks, > Xiaolong > > > > _______________________________________________ > LKP mailing list > LKP@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp >