Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 05:28:35 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] docs, debugfs: start explicit debugfs documentation
Message-ID: <20180710052835.581cdf28@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180710064506.GA2316@kroah.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807091459410.118937@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
        <20180710064506.GA2316@kroah.com>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:45:06 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> For the "this is what a specific debugfs file contains", those should go
> into Documenation/ABI/ if you really want to document those types of
> things.

Do we really want to start populating Documentation/ABI with stuff that's
explicitly *not* ABI?  Keeping it separate might make more sense, IMO.
I'd put extfrag_index with the MM docs, for example.

> But as it is, this single patch does too many different things all at
> once.

...and yet not enough :)  This stuff is almost in RST already, it would
be nice to go all the way and integrate it into the rest of our docs.

Thanks,

jon