Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:45:17 +0200
From:   =?utf-8?B?TcOhdMOp?= Eckl <ecklm94@gmail.com>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: NFT_SOCKET don't use NF_SOCKET_IPV6 without
 NF_TABLES_IPV6
Message-ID: <20180710114517.nxnkav6mimyivh4m@sch.bme.hu>
References: <20180709213537.2748896-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20180710080227.qwh53ahq26j6phhd@sch.bme.hu>
 <20180710080538.d7xqpjdvpksfrx6o@sch.bme.hu>
 <CAK8P3a0zYmdoMdWdFDcWprZY_4w2hbMYq4--iZB=JE4x2UiscA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180710105605.evgtmjiq5z46zld6@salvia>
 <20180710111536.hio2xalz7pyxucc6@sch.bme.hu>
 <20180710112459.ielgaydrgd4kxizo@salvia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180710112459.ielgaydrgd4kxizo@salvia>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180622
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:24:59PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:15:36PM +0200, M?t? Eckl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> [...]
> > This patch only solves the nf_socket and nft_socket modules problem so I can
> > only submit a v2 for 'netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select dependencies' but
> > you already applied it so it would meen a force push. Should I do this?
> > 
> > I think Arnd's patch solves these problems in case we don't want to force-push
> > or rebase.
> 
> You are refering to these two patches, right?
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941374/
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941696/

Oh, I missed the first one. So basically I should just squash them and resubmit
right? Or even replace ("netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select
dependencies") with these changes?

> > > I think it's better if we toss your original patch in the tree and
> > > rebase, ie. take the new one that fixes all issues that Arnd is
> > > reporting. It would be good if we can sort out this before I send the
> > > next pull request for net-next stuff.
> > > 
> > > I was afraid of fallout like this when I saw your original patch,
> > > kbuild is always tricky.
> > 
> > This patch is not related to the nft_tproxy module (it seems that you refer to
> > that) as Arnd didn't have that in the tree when doing this. I'll send a v4 fot
> > the tproxy module, but that cannot be related to this one as it is not in tree
> > yet.
> 
> No, I'm refering to 35bf1ccecaaa ("netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6
> select dependencies"), that is causing the issues.
> 
> Thanks.