Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:14:33 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E1t=E9?= Eckl <ecklm94@gmail.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: NFT_SOCKET don't use NF_SOCKET_IPV6 without
 NF_TABLES_IPV6
Message-ID: <20180710121433.in7tzjahptem6vnq@salvia>
References: <20180709213537.2748896-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20180710080227.qwh53ahq26j6phhd@sch.bme.hu>
 <20180710080538.d7xqpjdvpksfrx6o@sch.bme.hu>
 <CAK8P3a0zYmdoMdWdFDcWprZY_4w2hbMYq4--iZB=JE4x2UiscA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180710105605.evgtmjiq5z46zld6@salvia>
 <20180710111536.hio2xalz7pyxucc6@sch.bme.hu>
 <20180710112459.ielgaydrgd4kxizo@salvia>
 <20180710114517.nxnkav6mimyivh4m@sch.bme.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180710114517.nxnkav6mimyivh4m@sch.bme.hu>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:45:17PM +0200, M?t? Eckl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:24:59PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:15:36PM +0200, M?t? Eckl wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > [...]
> > > This patch only solves the nf_socket and nft_socket modules problem so I can
> > > only submit a v2 for 'netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select dependencies' but
> > > you already applied it so it would meen a force push. Should I do this?
> > > 
> > > I think Arnd's patch solves these problems in case we don't want to force-push
> > > or rebase.
> > 
> > You are refering to these two patches, right?
> > 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941374/
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941696/
> 
> Oh, I missed the first one. So basically I should just squash them and resubmit
> right? Or even replace ("netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select
> dependencies") with these changes?

That's one possibility, yes.