Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp652236imm; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeNTpESUV3OeKYf0gAhPtzGwU+omkHg2acaAljl+MA8rkzy1wjosKuINQXo0OcAlJkd7CXA X-Received: by 2002:a62:170c:: with SMTP id 12-v6mr30453883pfx.139.1531323746180; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531323746; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sTJfF0qH7pE7GyLQsDr3hFZM4GCzTzUuN1F3cjTU2Bt6ditNwFkne9YRtTyW72TLMh SMcccuNeLa51OtGbVolN2zv4aQmVxjI2pk7BdwaWMAixYjV2l6aLlXSQOUk/l+6kiqUP 0hQVjISjJT+Or16CYqg6W+wBvUC0nKnbsPYnCaPxhJ1++sef4DSKyxS6RxOIFPA0gfLc dXR3A+lLMbIYg3cdcFwQn6IeNSZs/iUy/zT4UOgq2D1MlASQnKrx4/C2arJFmVKe1HZl MK4Niwj0qZbaZGL3dLVVy3fKBZu4sLLoOrBiIXAvfhg2HX2HTpp/eGhNOzELZb6uasqk 1MZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=gkNhdCC4H37WUWDvTcxUGQl/cZ4W1UhnE90cWKge/U0=; b=cKJh2O1YOZv1holkfFWbRSI1RsQmGQspOnD3OB41jJ/2uXQIECYj07SgBQ8R2x89Pt ODyUlABsmZvQ8DJO7cNy/oW1w6mDh3274UgmGbHcIe/+3+yi1BT9Q5NaAeVuC1Yz3lrk t4tNDQt+7TASVnjMWW0VXQXuI72B+7OWeVLq2nvZNCE4uJRi0hKcBy6qJXg8tgiykYQZ mzsq8GSnNIH7XO+nYL6u8lpWAjotAwzQ1YgkDRE3Bu0F7kCi1O11wNlQvXQh08rQOSlD 0aBusgCqe9evxW8eYFJKc9Abpo0cjm1mKJ7GmntJZf6kRrcjv+S/0PpDpgOcgaxSznVc CpTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z8-v6si19148406pgr.260.2018.07.11.08.42.10; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732462AbeGKMva (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:51:30 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37664 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726457AbeGKMva (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:51:30 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1545AADAB; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:47:11 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Cannon Matthews Cc: Andrew Morton , Mike Kravetz , Nadia Yvette Chambers , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andreslc@google.com, pfeiner@google.com, dmatlack@google.com, gthelen@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: don't zero 1GiB bootmem pages. Message-ID: <20180711124711.GA20172@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180710184903.68239-1-cannonmatthews@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180710184903.68239-1-cannonmatthews@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 10-07-18 11:49:03, Cannon Matthews wrote: > When using 1GiB pages during early boot, use the new > memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw() function to allocate memory without > zeroing it. Zeroing out hundreds or thousands of GiB in a single core > memset() call is very slow, and can make early boot last upwards of > 20-30 minutes on multi TiB machines. > > To be safe, still zero the first sizeof(struct boomem_huge_page) bytes > since this is used a temporary storage place for this info until > gather_bootmem_prealloc() processes them later. > > The rest of the memory does not need to be zero'd as the hugetlb pages > are always zero'd on page fault. > > Tested: Booted with ~3800 1G pages, and it booted successfully in > roughly the same amount of time as with 0, as opposed to the 25+ > minutes it would take before. The patch makes perfect sense to me. I wasn't even aware that it zeroying memblock allocation. Thanks for spotting this and fixing it. > Signed-off-by: Cannon Matthews I just do not think we need to to zero huge_bootmem_page portion of it. It should be sufficient to INIT_LIST_HEAD before list_add. We do initialize the rest explicitly already. > --- > mm/hugetlb.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > index 3612fbb32e9d..c93a2c77e881 100644 > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > @@ -2101,7 +2101,7 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h) > for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, &node_states[N_MEMORY]) { > void *addr; > > - addr = memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic( > + addr = memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw( > huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h), > 0, BOOTMEM_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node); > if (addr) { > @@ -2109,7 +2109,12 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h) > * Use the beginning of the huge page to store the > * huge_bootmem_page struct (until gather_bootmem > * puts them into the mem_map). > + * > + * memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw returns non-zero'd > + * memory so zero out just enough for this struct, the > + * rest will be zero'd on page fault. > */ > + memset(addr, 0, sizeof(struct huge_bootmem_page)); > m = addr; > goto found; > } > -- > 2.18.0.203.gfac676dfb9-goog -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs