Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:06:41 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] blk: use for_each_if
Message-ID: <20180711200641.GJ72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
References: <20180709083650.23549-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
 <20180709083650.23549-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
 <20180711164058.GC72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <20180711164536.GD72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <965184f9-e5ed-3c8b-bfd7-a033a252371b@kernel.dk>
 <CAKMK7uE5aJq-1wd0ZOhwFaTy3iKMAZsfdAf=Tw+eGxtCmfcVQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <85df8c40-dac9-5f97-f81a-6de061cfdfa8@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <85df8c40-dac9-5f97-f81a-6de061cfdfa8@kernel.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:31:51PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I don't think there's a git easy way of sending it out outside of
> just ensuring that everybody is CC'ed on everything. I don't mind
> that at all. I don't subscribe to lkml, and the patches weren't
> sent to linux-block. Hence all I see is this stand-alone patch,
> and logic would dictate that it's stand-alone (but it isn't).

What I sometimes do is including a short blurb on each patch giving
the overview and action hints (e.g. this is part of patchset doing XYZ
and should be routed such and such).  It's a bit redundant but has
worked pretty well for patchsets with dependenat & sweeping changes.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun