Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:35:05 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, page_alloc: double zone's batchsize
Message-Id: <20180711143505.5ccb378fb67dc6ba8fa202a3@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180711055855.29072-1-aaron.lu@intel.com>
References: <20180711055855.29072-1-aaron.lu@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:58:55 +0800 Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote:

> [550 lines of changelog]

OK, I'm convinced ;)  That was a lot of work - thanks for being exhaustive.

Of course, not all the world is x86 but I think we can be confident
that other architectures are unlikely to be harmed by the change, at least.