Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 01:37:00 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] 9p: Use IDRs more effectively
Message-ID: <20180711233659.GA5684@nautica>
References: <20180711210225.19730-1-willy@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180711210225.19730-1-willy@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> The 9p code doesn't take advantage of the IDR's ability to store
> a pointer.  We can actually get rid of the p9_idpool abstraction
> and the multi-dimensional array of requests.
> 
> v2: Address feedback from Dominique.

Thanks, I've picked them up for 4.19
 ( git://github.com/martinetd/linux 9p-next as per mail on
 v9fs-developer list, "Current 9P patches - test branch")

This shouldn't stop anyone else from doing more reviews/test, I'm doing
this 9p-patch-gathering on no autority and I've only checked very basic
things for now.

-- 
Dominique Martinet