Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:03:27 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromiun.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET
Message-ID: <20180712140327.GA7810@gmail.com>
References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
 <20180710222639.8241-26-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
 <20180711102035.GB8574@gmail.com>
 <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1531323638.13297.24.camel@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> wrote:

> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > > index e2ee403865eb..ac2bc3a18427 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > > @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ enum x86_regset {
> > > ?	REGSET_IOPERM64 = REGSET_XFP,
> > > ?	REGSET_XSTATE,
> > > ?	REGSET_TLS,
> > > +	REGSET_CET64 = REGSET_TLS,
> > > ?	REGSET_IOPERM32,
> > > +	REGSET_CET32,
> > > ?};
> > Why does REGSET_CET64 alias on REGSET_TLS?
> 
> In x86_64_regsets[], there is no [REGSET_TLS]. ?The core dump code
> cannot handle holes in the array.

Is there a fundamental (ABI) reason for that?

> > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"),
> > not to CFE?
> > 
> 
> I don't know if I can change that, will find out.

So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal 
names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET 
if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference.

Or something like that.

Thanks,

	Ingo