Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180711021136.GN30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180711022206.12571-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CA+55aFxc7M9g+jqVnMHAsK350Ty1tQ9AghuJhBug+FPA6=XQrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180711152555.GR30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180711161540.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20180712124326.GA19272@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20180712124326.GA19272@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:05:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwyOHvwV4qkmM1kRYQ+4brWbLSHaXE8GPV41u5Sj-AG4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/42] drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl(): fix open-coded filp_clone_open()
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:43 AM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> A question regarding the customs in such situations - are previous
> Reviewed-by/Acked-by normally kept across rebases like that?

Yeah, unless there were big changes, keep the reviewed/acked-by lines.

Otherwise you'd never be able to handle different people giving
slightly different feedback about separate issues.

              Linus