Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp328550imm; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 20:46:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfzhbzjyngh0xcXhrptlhWeDNICw8vJFdY5vPqpgSYbO/T6YlRbVthlnaO7cDaYBAgQlh34 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:264:: with SMTP id 91-v6mr4585347plc.341.1531453613929; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 20:46:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531453613; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ofMDol5ENT67pTEPKyVSrHbenh1sQpNW7+v1VywKVREnB6Mg7p+06NJFsHZblQshzs wv7+bM2s28cOKvLHR3QpM/6sFF9KHK35ZdbKQutKxMm9NpxdXFpte7AldxYjscFrMqvf 2z9Ot9iIFRGtV9lf4YJlhoQl6TAm4yY9OrVRyOBT/pZr7EOc2it1YUnhqHCX1naNFOQW 1/wyYcsC/NyO7hH2pGMKSV0wKoVXtvAJ/uOrQwgHla0SZtdKMRWwVkqiEZHGLaa9uyNK wPQ9EAbnNAUmVHIHr7s5oGXgUPwLLtOdUAD8vX/2f2brbcTdSPakA3aXgqgXNowgMuuR cfPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=M4vCGEFYE2RIcOv2hMYGk+rIL2k2Zp2bq7HTEvdr8HA=; b=YXY7zyBgODm0nmmBi62HlpGOf8UyGjUJ+Gvi6BDwCz/Xcv4oLrGzEg3AGE/BhkELR4 s6hDM8K9iUH/hZFxW7vy5rBQC1Kbf+yQI4JBVhOfe2eLoSYzZMZq/Hy5rnR81+Goo4vE nXaVOsSwvuGQ7RWzNLVSAkwpUgcfwc9NO2Quz3+p5aqg/nMjk/RjUXLv5M8nOHB3XFw6 2VOIGtHsDciS+MDOo9ni8e9hVmOXyowGhWbnbyu++XLU0OXR49wih9M2hLfe/l4t7vn6 g9UXGR9ajk/tZgxIjFuPVKtHpj0TIBZ2YFrD69QapYI6V+h+ThSFI30w4eSpUzFBvg+5 ALcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id az6-v6si17240873plb.267.2018.07.12.20.46.38; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 20:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387979AbeGMD6m (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:58:42 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:9619 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387722AbeGMD6m (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:58:42 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 888F650C07E61; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:45:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.134.22.195) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.382.0; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:45:39 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: disable small discard in lfs mode To: Yunlong Song , , , CC: , , , , , References: <1531408170-45758-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com> <1531408170-45758-5-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <2566d6f6-4f3b-e2d8-326e-450372b71b44@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:45:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/7/13 11:39, Yunlong Song wrote: > How about change test_opt(sbi, LFS) to f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi->sb) in > this patch, we apply > this patch to zoned block device? IIRC, we will use blkdev_reset_zones instead of __queue_discard_cmd for such kind of device, so we will not encounter the issue you described. Thanks, > > On 2018/7/13 11:17, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2018/7/12 23:09, Yunlong Song wrote: >>> In lfs mode, it is better to send the discard of the overall section >>> each time to avoid missing alignment with flash. >> Hmm.. I think LFS mode can be used widely on different kind of device instead of >> just on zoned block device, so let's just keep old implementation here. >> >> Thanks, >> >>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song >>> --- >>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ++- >>> fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 4 ++++ >>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>> index fd38b61..f6c20e0 100644 >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>> @@ -1766,7 +1766,8 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) >>> atomic_set(&dcc->issing_discard, 0); >>> atomic_set(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt, 0); >>> dcc->nr_discards = 0; >>> - dcc->max_discards = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg; >>> + dcc->max_discards = test_opt(sbi, LFS) ? 0 : >>> + MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg; >>> dcc->undiscard_blks = 0; >>> dcc->root = RB_ROOT; >>> dcc->rbtree_check = false; >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c >>> index 2e7e611..4b6c457 100644 >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c >>> @@ -271,6 +271,10 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a, >>> return count; >>> } >>> >>> + if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "max_small_discards") && >>> + test_opt(sbi, LFS)) >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + >>> *ui = t; >>> >>> if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "iostat_enable") && *ui == 0) >>> >> >> . >> >