Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp498412imm; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc6Htjd7Goa1UU142zXYg8fr2SyxLLaF8sSYZeBF0QLsDlVb2jvzF5CdIJn6+mxbGKD+fDJ X-Received: by 2002:a62:ac12:: with SMTP id v18-v6mr5833370pfe.126.1531468636712; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531468636; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sWBIUfCP/fvZ7T6pln7h/6VJRvTm8n+fm6yOgUAVQgO+3vz4oYXQBoWShJ/LSI/Scj SOniqqFVSYDwEcq6eM0nWIAHEuGatwn6OOuE30U08tWPslcYQyQLeblnsls9UtZG6k6m XrCSt1qLiF66sPWxIdmN8nrgz3AxpoZHRnUmKIubywk7BE7GN0Bbqz69UhZjXJcYOplV UE+HEC4dyJmv8cnL1BaOEKHPFa06Ccq+9uGI1gN6crfmFuDpn0+Imm1NLEdQZgRsBZ2F hfbAbLS9dZWQNYYlgEyVFx7GbIplsXVtAAHkRtB0MzieU0CrgcA0qD59+aBZAeIYLDG+ J0Gg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=qOWfd8RwVllq0WRYg8m9QXscZhIlLgt31yM/3CtX+sk=; b=0/ItKBJ8XgN2LFnaeqatj3RA3Z5oeDAP8dvyaF/qn1lRcfGtCydFGgL6OG3wdSvHUW eW/zKUqR9IHgfmUdS0mu0E4L+RpWm1vf8a/djgkpJ7FiFFp2yN52gRKG004cHGT6yoJa 8ulS1JTP0YlGqNI7xtx1GvO9o4ZITU2GdoJldVDTVQ8wymnOA0tu5pdlH4v9hce6Sana NrL5rjJawRRNAZfJxhrzJ+/6n2+5nLwUi305FjDzRwci/56xi1zb0+SwzFl9VhmWK/7s BcMDTMhoPv1p+gstq13Saz7+CllhNEQEdwn3VrkY1jF08Em5/0kQNt+tpql+molZCW84 8JcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=QxS9NJui; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si23506249plz.379.2018.07.13.00.57.01; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=QxS9NJui; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731482AbeGMII7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 04:08:59 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:41732 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729691AbeGMII7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 04:08:59 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6D7tAq6041226; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 02:55:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1531468510; bh=qOWfd8RwVllq0WRYg8m9QXscZhIlLgt31yM/3CtX+sk=; h=Subject:To:References:CC:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QxS9NJuipTQaQpdbWyd82wbh5WbiBABCzXtdLYeUGVX7rl1pSWhieAG0oUwrIREp9 fIHwJ1MlOi8bkAsWmO+c8HWVnVCfdDhrT3SD+0oP0OsfqjFresFCKvXNULeL1v5iHL HKvx8ap04/B11lV16/4NORUqXCbFefH1IqsOBN/Y= Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (dfle111.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.32]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6D7tA24027388; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 02:55:10 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 02:55:10 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 02:55:10 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.233] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6D7t6TB007757; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 02:55:07 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/12] PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler To: Gustavo Pimentel , , , , , , , References: <5e4ca8380a65da72cf5d3ab46588948e3537aeae.1531155252.git.gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> CC: , , From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:25:06 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5e4ca8380a65da72cf5d3ab46588948e3537aeae.1531155252.git.gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Monday 09 July 2018 11:12 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > Add PCIe config space capability search function. > > Add sysfs set/get interface to allow the change of EP MSI-X maximum number. > > Add EP MSI-X callback for triggering interruptions. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel > --- > Change v1->v2: > - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version. > Change v2->v3: > - Moved dra7xx_pcie_raise_irq() signature change to patch file #3. > - Moved artpec6_pcie_raise_irq() signature change to patch file #3. > - Replaced wrong return value 0 to -EINVAL. > - Removed an else if by code refactoring. > - Reduced the size of ioremap_nocache mapping from ep->addr_size to > PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE. > - Fixed a small bug. If the MSI-X vector bit has been set, the function > would return without executing the proper unmap. > Change v3->v4: > - Rebased to Lorenzo's master branch v4.18-rc1. > - Added static prefix to __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap function. > Change v4->v5: > - Added static prefix to dw_pcie_ep_find_capability function. > - Swap patch files position (#2 <-> #3). > - Moved dw_pcie_ep_raise_irq and dw_plat_pcie_ep_raise_irq functions > signatures change to patch file #2. > Change v5->v6: > - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version. > Change v6->v7: > - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version. > Change v7->v8: > - Re-sending the patch series. > Change v8->v9: > - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version. > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 2 + > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 12 ++ > 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > index 69d039d..72c4188 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > @@ -40,6 +40,39 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar) > __dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar, 0); > } > > +static u8 __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap_ptr, > + u8 cap) > +{ > + u8 cap_id, next_cap_ptr; > + u16 reg; > + > + reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, cap_ptr); > + next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0xff00) >> 8; > + cap_id = (reg & 0x00ff); > + > + if (!next_cap_ptr || cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX) > + return 0; > + > + if (cap_id == cap) > + return cap_ptr; > + > + return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(pci, next_cap_ptr, cap); > +} > + > +static u8 dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap) > +{ > + u8 next_cap_ptr; > + u16 reg; > + > + reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST); > + next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0x00ff); > + > + if (!next_cap_ptr) > + return 0; > + > + return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(pci, next_cap_ptr, cap); > +} > + > static int dw_pcie_ep_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > struct pci_epf_header *hdr) > { > @@ -241,6 +274,45 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 encode_int) > return 0; > } > > +static int dw_pcie_ep_get_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc); > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > + u32 val, reg; > + > + if (!ep->msix_cap) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + reg = ep->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS; > + val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg); > + if (!(val & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + val &= PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE; > + > + return val; > +} > + > +static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u16 interrupts) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc); > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > + u32 val, reg; > + > + if (!ep->msix_cap) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + reg = ep->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS; > + val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg); > + val &= ~PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE; > + val |= interrupts; > + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); > + dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, reg, val); > + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int dw_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, > enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u16 interrupt_num) > { > @@ -282,6 +354,8 @@ static const struct pci_epc_ops epc_ops = { > .unmap_addr = dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr, > .set_msi = dw_pcie_ep_set_msi, > .get_msi = dw_pcie_ep_get_msi, > + .set_msix = dw_pcie_ep_set_msix, > + .get_msix = dw_pcie_ep_get_msix, > .raise_irq = dw_pcie_ep_raise_irq, > .start = dw_pcie_ep_start, > .stop = dw_pcie_ep_stop, > @@ -322,6 +396,64 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > return 0; > } > > +int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > + u16 interrupt_num) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > + struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc; > + u16 tbl_offset, bir; > + u32 bar_addr_upper, bar_addr_lower; > + u32 msg_addr_upper, msg_addr_lower; > + u32 reg, msg_data, vec_ctrl; > + u64 tbl_addr, msg_addr, reg_u64; > + void __iomem *msix_tbl; > + int ret; > + > + reg = ep->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_TABLE; > + tbl_offset = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg); > + bir = (tbl_offset & PCI_MSIX_TABLE_BIR); > + tbl_offset &= PCI_MSIX_TABLE_OFFSET; > + tbl_offset >>= 3; > + > + reg = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + (4 * bir); > + bar_addr_upper = 0; > + bar_addr_lower = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg); > + reg_u64 = (bar_addr_lower & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_MASK); > + if (reg_u64 == PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) > + bar_addr_upper = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, reg + 4); > + > + tbl_addr = ((u64) bar_addr_upper) << 32 | bar_addr_lower; > + tbl_addr += (tbl_offset + ((interrupt_num - 1) * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE)); > + tbl_addr &= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK; > + > + msix_tbl = ioremap_nocache(ep->phys_base + tbl_addr, > + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE); > + if (!msix_tbl) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + msg_addr_lower = readl(msix_tbl + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR); > + msg_addr_upper = readl(msix_tbl + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_UPPER_ADDR); > + msg_addr = ((u64) msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower; > + msg_data = readl(msix_tbl + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA); > + vec_ctrl = readl(msix_tbl + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL); > + > + iounmap(msix_tbl); > + > + if (vec_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) > + return -EPERM; > + > + ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, ep->msix_mem_phys, msg_addr, > + epc->mem->page_size); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + writel(msg_data, ep->msix_mem); > + > + dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(epc, func_no, ep->msix_mem_phys); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > { > struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc; > @@ -329,6 +461,9 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > pci_epc_mem_free_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys, ep->msi_mem, > epc->mem->page_size); > > + pci_epc_mem_free_addr(epc, ep->msix_mem_phys, ep->msix_mem, > + epc->mem->page_size); > + > pci_epc_mem_exit(epc); > } > > @@ -415,6 +550,15 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > dev_err(dev, "Failed to reserve memory for MSI\n"); > return -ENOMEM; > } > + ep->msi_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI); > + > + ep->msix_mem = pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr(epc, &ep->msix_mem_phys, > + epc->mem->page_size); > + if (!ep->msix_mem) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to reserve memory for MSI-X\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; Do we have to allocate memory for MSIX memory separately? I think we can reuse msi_mem. That's also because we shouldn't fail if a platform doesn't support MSIX and fails to allocate msix_mem. Thanks Kishon