Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp924356imm; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:32:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcsX3OkHfo3sPygRqXxwnnwf9swswV7aA7snqbT4OYCSeHCYKnZ57u6dNzqenSycX2sxMQH X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:28a6:: with SMTP id f35-v6mr6856033plb.110.1531495947016; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:32:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531495946; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tz8nV13zFPOgdDfT0Ve7mnsczuCtkqMC6IzlBR6YXA7vx9Y7U/heo+8qhoS2xej7o3 dr+BpZXi7U9RkRnNMIxDsEhF/sbavIGDcaLoATSk2VcjQEz60ios+wk25Y0KgEoB0Kht OaCUgVx5EiY+CiUXWRsqDUh+hvFTjA5LMZih4PuRcJ0N33hOZJ7m4dlR7praDwY72Vyi wwtbvKbwnXQRJZbf4pHPOLGyad2pSIMWY+JkJ2P5W9TJCB9OW4AOsazTmUxKZB0R1NyF wEWeA0dbci/jJOn23slEAzc5rOY6EP8Sh8vh3MutQn3JgYGmQpfTZCTRBVih6eX4hLvz JrbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=r8hpO5evYxv6qt2/LRvgS20+DzYjnxuwOTaknOTaSW8=; b=so1Chi6+EL4jBnlFEslFc3LAuvUKipT1Vo7cUuxIJPAojBANqpXokR5OZ46VqO/8Gu yq3PMJs5nWDLcvbXIFToHokFpsL5IxuOKHqeXbvarrY2TrAoGMdG7jRU7nSTQmJakje4 WaKMVXOpMySBi8aH52qlbC6VIDsmhy2658FP6LjP2QS87JFNCJOFWbMVJXQtT0iMbUT7 tG4xTivQkZIHOf9txqtTutG59MEeWOeufydhxbNtHZS7hrYrZJlGZifNeJlfFi+W8/lL pdOFwSh/lS5T5AeGtBJEtovjsZFvTIWc3ALkh4LQA8MYlHZ6GMgsbhm3jjBjPod+iqn7 ZPhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k185-v6si23672897pgd.15.2018.07.13.08.32.12; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731306AbeGMPqm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:46:42 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147]:44361 "EHLO nautica.notk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729762AbeGMPqm (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:46:42 -0400 Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A6E04C009; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:31:19 +0200 From: Dominique Martinet To: Jens Axboe Cc: "Ed L. Cashin" , Linus Walleij , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] block/aoenet: change strncpy+truncation to strlcpy Message-ID: <20180713153119.GC14190@nautica> References: <1531444483-17338-1-git-send-email-asmadeus@codewreck.org> <1531445105-18941-1-git-send-email-asmadeus@codewreck.org> <41bf49e3-70a5-4362-7389-55752ebc6c02@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41bf49e3-70a5-4362-7389-55752ebc6c02@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote on Fri, Jul 13, 2018: > This is a weird combination in terms of a single patch, why is > it patching aoe and gpiolib in one patch? I must have failed some git add command, I didn't realize they were together until you pointed it out just now. This has been discussed more lengthly on the netdev side but the whole patch serie has been (quite) a bit too hasty; on one side I've been given some interesting feedback that I would not have gotten just sending the coccinelle patch first but I really should have waited for that to land first and most importantly spend more time on each individual patch, this was rude of me. I will make sure they are split in a v2, and send them individually (well, per big component) as self-explaining patches rather than as a block, once the coccinelle patch has been accepted. Thank you for the review, -- Dominique Martinet