Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1036580imm; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:20:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfGYMlMSyFIL6E4/fMK2CTJH4z3/jVjwWfbvbW+fkxw5DAh5v7BTou9rjfhj6ALczQEBWcE X-Received: by 2002:a62:8b87:: with SMTP id e7-v6mr8016175pfl.133.1531502438837; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:20:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531502438; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u/UwbYOcgMB4221xcvsj/YZYlFKXZlmIXL0wc1OPk1QXYtmEheCtpF6RhQKj/kmSUZ neVhutpNQLlTNL/CkZ4+UJtRF8zhXKq4BHXYDFYh31oyudszd1ksBWSm5zULXXbqc6/k ZyH/U4T9155mL3B0e7tKX7JZCh4SggpO6QVmgZzhR1t1snTxvCzMQK9nxGGo3YnrUESN m1glpBbWvdNv9QFd8yjwWi7wbvIKQOWWnACkguRBle/qx7CyPCkfHfNCPgI3nQv6ykdF 9bBkBth5Ccl/UQXvp1U1UWCNNTjeWl8vcpLML4EYFxCKaKZheLBU4Y82Na1NFi7eIrxa nIZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=Q+oNiPN02R9ua7PcXXpXrRx8R0iBk3JgzpV28g5kHXM=; b=lJQ7mtGTYp1OiVz/EM3IFbFA9r6QpBfX77l/YxyRV/ABUL5hIKdFLzkSn8sjZ6iNia z6pUli9QgRphMz16yMIObgpo4WDGvmrqEcTig+xc7KxfQQfwyufCTEYHVrWi0/YM1382 UY59QxzxDb1div45Coh6iQ1D9oCVPclk0T2jvz+O0Lhzjv2hMrgbKG7qAMIOZPMOddVm YuiGr8q2O6KNcXnQgguGnLjyMOkMrQZvgMieIsB56aEIABaR6Zx6dpUg9VO8W+gXhruU 9fG/u8HnQTfhmBgYmktJSEbp/SPXRkEavhByORUfZlLVVnMj0UvfjlKB8SCNfSd/L9AV 3xdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=TOeMqN4r; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si6200500pgb.107.2018.07.13.10.20.23; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=TOeMqN4r; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730196AbeGMRfL (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:35:11 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38184 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729622AbeGMRfL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:35:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5166208B4 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:19:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1531502379; bh=dK51TJZdckjPERQmsTpIOfE71kVdNq5QArqx4wvBVWg=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=TOeMqN4rdB6W0iQZZfpuByi4wzUhaVPVsd6d/PYxyZS3kVviYVOJuLRivadcSLP9I vng1ZoHW7iSa0cKsDgy2GcCuPcQJrr2Qewym1VgZmFafBMR2zza6jdM2O1v3FwGa04 vkLk2JK4LYS7SNsL+rFgje/jZlXuvKTtSlgGjIlo= Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id c13-v6so25790193wrt.1 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:19:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEvAviqSYlnwK0mk4bUIJNcY1U5VjpPA0XQ7mS4KWH/nZJDQAUa W1UEz9HiKRzE2QaCigiAXcZq7gcHAUyKoksdOR9e0g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8062:: with SMTP id 89-v6mr5178989wrk.221.1531502377290; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:19:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a1c:d548:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:19:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180713094849.5bsfpwhxzo5r5exk@8bytes.org> References: <1531308586-29340-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <1531308586-29340-4-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <823BAA9B-FACA-4E91-BE56-315FF569297C@amacapital.net> <20180713094849.5bsfpwhxzo5r5exk@8bytes.org> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:19:16 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/39] x86/entry/32: Load task stack from x86_tss.sp1 in SYSENTER handler To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , X86 ML , LKML , Linux-MM , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg KH , Will Deacon , "Liguori, Anthony" , Daniel Gruss , Hugh Dickins , Kees Cook , Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , Pavel Machek , "David H . Gutteridge" , Joerg Roedel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:48 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:49:13PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > On Jul 11, 2018, at 4:29 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> > /* Offset from the sysenter stack to tss.sp0 */ >> > - DEFINE(TSS_entry_stack, offsetof(struct cpu_entry_area, tss.x86_tss.sp0) - >> > + DEFINE(TSS_entry_stack, offsetof(struct cpu_entry_area, tss.x86_tss.sp1) - >> > offsetofend(struct cpu_entry_area, entry_stack_page.stack)); >> > >> >> The code reads differently. Did you perhaps mean TSS_task_stack? > > Well, the offset name came from TSS_sysenter_sp0, which was the offset > from the sysenter_sp0 (==sysenter-stack) to the task stack in TSS, now > sysenter_sp0 became entry_stack, because its used for all entry points > and not only sysenter. So with the old convention the naming makes still > sense, no? > Trying to parse it certainly makes my brain hurt a bit. This is the offset from the entry stack to sp1, where sp1 is the location of the pointer to the task stack. Maybe all the arithmetic could go in entry_32.S and the asm-offset name could just be TSS_sp1, just like on 64-bit? --Andy