Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf 1/5] bpf: bpf_prog_array_alloc() should return a generic non-rcu pointer
Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:41:10 -0700
Message-ID: <20180713194114.2711-1-guro@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: fb.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2018 19:41:29.0978 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fb4e9715-c7d4-4ee9-988e-08d5e8f8a13b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 8ae927fe-1255-47a7-a2af-5f3a069daaa2
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR15MB0171
X-OriginatorOrg: fb.com
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-13_07:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
X-FB-Internal: Safe
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Currently the return type of the bpf_prog_array_alloc() is
struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *, which is not quite correct.
Obviously, the returned pointer is a generic pointer, which
is valid for an indefinite amount of time and it's not shared
with anyone else, so there is no sense in marking it as __rcu.

This change eliminate the following sparse warnings:
kernel/bpf/core.c:1544:31: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1544:31:    expected struct bpf_prog_array [noderef] <asn:4>*
kernel/bpf/core.c:1544:31:    got void *
kernel/bpf/core.c:1548:17: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1548:17:    expected struct bpf_prog_array [noderef] <asn:4>*
kernel/bpf/core.c:1548:17:    got struct bpf_prog_array *<noident>
kernel/bpf/core.c:1681:15: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1681:15:    expected struct bpf_prog_array *array
kernel/bpf/core.c:1681:15:    got struct bpf_prog_array [noderef] <asn:4>*

Fixes: 324bda9e6c5a ("bpf: multi program support for cgroup+bpf")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
 kernel/bpf/core.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 8827e797ff97..943fb08d8287 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_array {
 	struct bpf_prog *progs[0];
 };
 
-struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags);
+struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags);
 void bpf_prog_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *progs);
 int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *progs);
 int bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *progs,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 1e5625d46414..253aa8e79c7b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ static struct {
 	.null_prog = NULL,
 };
 
-struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags)
+struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	if (prog_cnt)
 		return kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_prog_array) +
-- 
2.14.4