Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261891AbTIPNJc (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:09:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261893AbTIPNJc (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:09:32 -0400 Received: from mikonos.cyclades.com.br ([200.230.227.67]:22534 "EHLO firewall.cyclades.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261891AbTIPNJb (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:09:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:11:49 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Stephan von Krawczynski cc: Marcelo Tosatti , , Subject: Re: experiences beyond 4 GB RAM with 2.4.22 In-Reply-To: <20030916102113.0f00d7e9.skraw@ithnet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1035 Lines: 28 On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > Sep 16 03:03:09 brenda last message repeated 2 times > Sep 16 03:03:09 brenda kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.1 OK > Sep 16 03:03:10 brenda last message repeated 2 times > > And then the nfs-action is dead. Process hangs. This has not happened with > 2.4.22 as a server. It showed up after a day of creating 4,7 GB dvd iso images. > Creating theses isos was ok, no error or so during the action. > Is it possible that pre4 does not recover all that well from former memory > pressure? > > > Have you tried 2.4.22-aa? > > Sorry, not yet. > I will go back to 2.4.22 and stress it to see if these effects show up. Oh... Jens just pointed bounce buffering is needed for the upper 2Gs. Maybe you have a SCSI card+disks to test ? 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/