Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp717561imm; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 10:40:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpet6wmcYEnlyW+rSd7f/Ylw09z/giXSG1losbV6cglVIz4BWV+IgOoJz8O25id1qovdWsF/ X-Received: by 2002:a62:843:: with SMTP id c64-v6mr11854963pfd.14.1531590007202; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 10:40:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531590007; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S8U33/N++pEIuxWkDoZId8ks9K7H6x6xdx/RqQ4HrLzpxRKRzXqJe+7YQ9e0rCxoDX 805NA8SNaTAvTsIR0DMn6H0i3Gat1tJDLtZj5rKoQxxB6kg3lxSQSJrjxVNhcR+UJ+R+ B2IHHvo+Wja8GYObLCoyTFgTi22TZWuzqDXnWadTqoQ3yRQDKOKI6ybt0KOJnqU0hvSR fsrD5rXmi/tH1NnkAnoOiFtaRbSfGG0XveIoVS80umwMlAh7TLCNJbYY28MQ5CZS4LmN 2X03uM1G5K/b8b2BwmeA09yTWhci0aZJpnAk+pex1tfbCHX2+P/0ao6WVeaOu7Ib8drv YUHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=ymZUvMDYHdeewF4POvm5cHEZRjsk1oT/pqBHoLOVfQw=; b=hunm2KPWC1WU4suJSmxeWPe0cwlQQK0u/tyBrrvjpD9A8ZpbEc7Ad6c7THSLQjkkFL G7p/GAMmwLe/6pHuOuKpEwgreKrsA6bzskRp5zViGkeDo1VQPlJX91D8gjO2MTL+3wrn Gdvtt/cRRw+70LMHjR70YfMcelJM6N9DmvfkX6z+B4KE/g2Z/EOxJHU6ETw2IK5JbBP3 p/Mh0pY9uJsxIfxqsWxHe/xoky4HgycnA2y/k5EJ1x9j83HiU5bg7LC5Etsj3DTI+A1X w+r1jAx5RGjBwcMInTkbT40pS26yqY3oDoN/peIz6fgv/2rJtbSeauHcTz5lBRTN9KV7 dsRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q8-v6si9386016pls.118.2018.07.14.10.39.52; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 10:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731051AbeGNR6U convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:58:20 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:40983 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727153AbeGNR6U (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:58:20 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id 50C7D80544; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:38:12 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Sasha Levin , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Greg KH , "julia.lawall@lip6.fr" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: bug-introducing patches Message-ID: <20180714173812.xhfwtcijlxebmn2k@devuan> References: <20180501163818.GD1468@sasha-vm> <20180501194450.GD10479@thunk.org> <20180501200019.GA7397@sasha-vm> <20180501205448.GE10479@thunk.org> <20180501220228.GD7397@sasha-vm> <20180502043017.GA11938@1wt.eu> <20180502194139.GA18390@sasha-vm> <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20180502200229.GA12729@1wt.eu> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > The way I see it, if a commit can get one or two tested-by, it's a good > > alternative to a week in -next. > > Agreed. Even their own actually. And I'm not kidding. Those who run large > amounts of tests on certain patches could really mention is in tested-by, > as opposed to the most common cases where the code was just regularly > tested. Actually, it would be cool to get "Tested: no" and "Tested: compile" tags in the commit mesages. Sometimes it is clear from the context that patch was not tested (treewide update of time to 64bit), but sometime it is not. This is especially problem for -stable, as it seems that lately patches are backported from new version without any testing. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html