Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2307922imm; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:01:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeoUpS9h3QyOVIbQ4JbPfU1WgQbj/t3Jl+41Nlc0Askw8HXMQnjwZubsmwBDR05e5GjlEii X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:89:: with SMTP id a9-v6mr16224134pla.326.1531746060529; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:01:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531746060; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=U76nw5+FGfUZVwitsr830VZkdm0qxDHU/jg7BNInWzkyj44HzZC0bKzHNNh470WDb7 ahsHFkt8DAcay2HUF9+cO4RWebFW3VYnJ1SR9EznZA/ncGQVOTtBX2Kcg4kAcfEUcrVR twP1BqZGq8uf1VhEMIj5YBqAujLY7AM1GHqHqqGF7a+SMvf9ZVScGrMlkiNf6gZzlCFy 0q4FlGErJPKOqzCbQqkQBORhPkw5v0V8iHYLhxi4LcOA5P1mbOBiW1GxTd03TnVrXMrb qQgjxF3bhSV7yTFy7YFT77VNNrsIxi06hkh69BNHvkJRzDFENftYT1y7zA+eYyCJp4qn irGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:arc-authentication-results; bh=TQD3qMNq0sllawmd3aIyITg71G8JV55y+MD7sI9M2qc=; b=BY2GwaN/N5HKq9hJaLuFo2nbga3VluwaAcgZqG2XyCSWNcFoNDT/U2YPBz/QynH3h7 3VEZDeUyx3NxuOWFrHqMGk9hfV/5/C8Op2a944PE3b6Wl2AbGcgOEn16Yf14hCdTXr/C pBPVgzc76WhP+yTsYD4hOvUtzpZ7r3UVxyXetm2m1fTgdsOiKKsaxtleIPhumWi2PPKS 9d3+khvea2hY9GDHhHypP3PAm1c7VT6Oar84FmjwFESsV1IWfuCJNFKfgTAZoWHZZjf4 y1SOiu7LllHZbZswy/9UC2JRdfhHGjxvAzqCniPgQ/x7JmYXd+Lf61DZwNGYxBPV0AHv Ec/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 136-v6si28743580pgb.587.2018.07.16.06.00.44; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:01:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730093AbeGPN1V convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:27:21 -0400 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:32924 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727522AbeGPN1V (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:27:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.117] (188.146.201.191.nat.umts.dynamic.t-mobile.pl [188.146.201.191]) by mail.holtmann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9991CF29E; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] Bluetooth: Extend btuart driver for join more vendor devices From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <1531641134.3955.19.camel@mtkswgap22> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:59:58 +0200 Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hedberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <6476BE78-3FE5-465F-8060-2215387323AA@holtmann.org> References: <85d449cdd34bf47d72935a821915e825c64a2145.1531150733.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com> <70616B99-5A2D-417A-8815-246700EEF4E2@holtmann.org> <1531641134.3955.19.camel@mtkswgap22> To: Sean Wang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sean, >>> Adding an independent btuart.h header allows these essential definitions >>> can be reused in vendor driver. Also, struct btuart_vnd is extended with >>> additional callbacks such as .init initializing vendor data, .shtudown, >>> .recv and .send supporting SoC specific framing for that btuart can >>> simply adapt to various Bluetooth uart-based devices. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang >>> --- >>> drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >>> drivers/bluetooth/btuart.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/bluetooth/btuart.h >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c >>> index a900aac..65d0086 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c >>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btuart.c >>> @@ -33,35 +33,11 @@ >>> #include >>> >>> #include "h4_recv.h" >>> +#include "btuart.h" >>> #include "btbcm.h" >>> >>> #define VERSION "1.0" >>> >>> -struct btuart_vnd { >>> - const struct h4_recv_pkt *recv_pkts; >>> - int recv_pkts_cnt; >>> - unsigned int manufacturer; >>> - int (*open)(struct hci_dev *hdev); >>> - int (*close)(struct hci_dev *hdev); >>> - int (*setup)(struct hci_dev *hdev); >>> -}; >>> - >>> -struct btuart_dev { >>> - struct hci_dev *hdev; >>> - struct serdev_device *serdev; >>> - >>> - struct work_struct tx_work; >>> - unsigned long tx_state; >>> - struct sk_buff_head txq; >>> - >>> - struct sk_buff *rx_skb; >>> - >>> - const struct btuart_vnd *vnd; >>> -}; >> >> I really like to avoid this since it is not clean. Frankly I prefer to keep the btuart.c driver for drivers that really just use H:4 as transport protocol. If the protocol is only H:4 alike and has extra headers, then it should be a separate driver. >> > > thanks for letting me know your concern. I think I'm a little over in reusing these existing methods and break something generic and its beauty. > > I'll make the driver be a separate one based on btuart in the next version. > > >> The common H:4 handling is abstracted in h4_recv.h already anyway and we can add more pieces if needed. However I also wonder since you have extra framing that the complex H:4 state keeping might be not needed at all. So it could be simplified. >> > > okay, I will get rid of h4_recv.h and consider to use more simplified logic to handle the extra framing and its payload. only if it is already framed by your extra header, but I seem to recall that it will frame it. For example the bfusb.c old driver does frame H:4 as well and then no extra state keeping for H:4 is needed. Just pass the frames up into the core via hci_recv_frame (or hci_recv_diag for vendor diagnostic) and move on with it. You can of course use h4_recv.h if you need to, but only do that if you are true H:4 stream and have no idea where a frame ends and starts. Regards Marcel