Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2549785imm; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:50:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfu4Hy5BOLPFjKIbaS7yu50alVTaE4Urv57G5jVD1ye7ibS/fdvPaZ4+/jggOOnm5lpiWeU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b112:: with SMTP id q18-v6mr17033818plr.284.1531759817259; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:50:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531759817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZZnbvADS2m3h6NU6jjSg0J31IGbqWJur4UlfyCg9UgzybJ24Qnb36n/Fda89pbyjMd R+pzNrMctIAPE6cq1bYNORUIvkuDzzG0CNFciD3n+rEC9Do3bkRWl4wDEQDTwzELgWD7 6xc7PW8ueaiRaUAGKUBO5eUbi7zhGDU4R2ZZc1OezQC3iJhU9EkTszCjIR5vGGose5uL 96Y1MmrMbPT3hOhLLVHMgPSV3TCQefTcAMAl6vsE2uWMjBbASbIUmg4/zWWhScXbZ7LM NVV8cUMtDSvdKNQ1bKcJRMDEYKwxDHd/q9/rLzFWtF/tV04SAgYZhgziPIs4iDzWJhPD 4eBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=XtTrb+va1Sgft9Nm0tpF5pPer0Rq174z6Li+oNZmhE4=; b=bY4fdtA8TKSExK8qWOFj21/F5iJJ4I7IPFCYM5iFPVlz9V8lvZzSs13bxVliudSyYM kBrWuCCq4YVRM2jdkuFtNt6yo4FAp/pfug5+w1CE3Q5hc3i0YNOfmbZn6egiw9abJaMm OlM0Qgp8eL7/uZTraXu9/9M/qZeECJLT+ueWi/KqD7o1l0GxmxJEXYOHkvv09H/5MowZ 2Opto8pD8k/+k1QoSrAEZSia/+xlikViN9oa34ccWgmvKbsu5lmm9itgiehCaHrt4SeQ q7o67eri43YES0C0A05l1Iv3+qiFbfF8S4SvzbzB2fS4wLHANrtWq2aIpKOIzA9Uau7x gkxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2-v6si5251131plk.111.2018.07.16.09.50.02; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728359AbeGPRRk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:40 -0400 Received: from smtp2.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.67]:41238 "EHLO smtp2.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727411AbeGPRRk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:40 -0400 Received: from math.ut.ee (unknown [IPv6:2001:bb8:2002:2400:5054:ff:fe3b:8db9]) by smtp2.it.da.ut.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035B2901DB; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: by math.ut.ee (Postfix, from userid 1014) id E5E792208EC; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by math.ut.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BC92206C6; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:21 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:21 +0300 (EEST) From: Meelis Roos To: Arnd Bergmann cc: Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: 4.18-rc* regression: x86-32 troubles (with timers?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Everything below here is is 'bad', which can be an indication that you > misclassified one of > the commits above as 'good' when it should have been 'bad'. The most likely > explanations are that you either typed the 'git bisect good' by accident, or > that the failure is not 100% reliable, and it sometimes works fine even on a > broken kernel. > > 0bc5fe857274133ca0 follows directly after 3a443bd6dd7c, "net/9p: correct the > variable name in v9fs_get_trans_by_name() comment", which is marked "good", > and can't really be good if 0bc5fe85727413 is bad and you are not using the > 'qed' driver. > > I'd retest 3a443bd6dd7c again to see if that should have been 'bad', and > if it was, test v4.17-rc4, which is what the net-next tree was based on. Yes, the same prebuilt 3a443bd6dd7c appeared to be bad when retesting it. Building v4.17-rc4 now. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)