Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:56:30 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
cc:     x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions?
In-Reply-To: <20180716160513.GA6080@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807161851290.1693@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20180716160513.GA6080@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote:

> At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom family is
> omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit fec9434a12f3
> to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a patch
> adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome?

Probably. Dave?

Thanks,

	tglx